Technologies        
  Hauptmenu
 
    Introduction
    Database
    -  Technologies
  -  Projects
    Calendar
    Discussions
    Contact & Links
    Imprint & Disclaimer
    Sitemap
 
 


     
 
Content
 
back to list go back to technology list      previous previous technology  next technology  next

   Wide-body stock  evaluated  
A 10 to 20% increase in car body width allows for the accommodation of another seat per row in passenger stock. This has strong effects on both energy efficiency and life cycle costs.
Technology field: Space utilisation
close main section General information
  close sub-section Description
   

Principle

Conventional stock for long-distance and regional service has an exterior coach width of around 2900 mm. In an effort to increase floorspace per coach, trains have been developed that are considerably wider. For our purposes, we define a wide-body train as one allowing a 2 3-seating arrangement in 2nd class and a 2 2- arrangement in 1st class. In main line service this usually requires a minimum width of about 3300 mm. The gain in floorspace is in the order of 10 to 20%. Considerations of the DB AG for a wide-coach version of the ICE 4 indicate an increase in seating capacity of 22% compared to the "normal" version (as opposed to slightly less for a double-decked version).

Examples

The following table lists some wide-body trains.

Denmark S-bane trains 3.60 m
Denmark IC/3 3.10 m
Norway Sleeper coach 3.24 m
Sweden Crusaris Regina 3.45 m
Netherlands     SM90 (wide body)     3.20 m
Japan Shinkansen 3.38 - 3.40 m     

Source: Andersson et al. 2001

  • The Lirex developed by Alstom shows that at least for regional service 5-seat arrangements can be integrated in coaches which are only 3042 mm wide.
  • An example of extremely wide coaches (3600 mm) is the Copenhagen suburban train set produced by a Siemens/LHB consortium. Many German suburban trains have a width of about 3200 mm.
  • In Japan there are also some 3.40 meter wide Shinkansen trains which are double-deckers. In some of their coaches there are 2 3 seats downstairs and 3 3 seats upstairs. Such a seat arrangement of course gives a significant reduction of comfort.

Infrastructural compatibility

As opposed to isolated solutions (e.g. suburban networks), mainline service sets more rigorous conditions to stock width, especially if interoperability is demanded. However some conceptional and technological measures could raise infrastructural compatibility of wide-body stock. Among them are reduced coach length (thus reducing the lateral swinging out in curves) and more high tech solutions such as a telematically controlled tilting away from infrastructural obstacles.

open main section General criteria
open main section Environmental criteria
open main section Economic criteria
no data available Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)
open main section Overall rating
References / Links:  Euro Transport Consult 1997;  Reemtsema, Kurz 1997;  Andersson et al. 2001;  Ernst 2001
Attachments:
Related projects:  The purchase of the new Copenhagen S-trains
Contact persons:
 date created: 2002-10-09
 
 
© UIC - International Union of Railways 2003
 
Aktionmenu
 
 Your contribution
   add technology
 Views of this page
   show overview
   show evaluation
   show details
 Print options
   print data sheet
   print screen
 Help
   Evaluation briefing
   Technology list
    French - German