 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
General information
|
|
 |
General criteria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Status of development: in use |
| |
|
|
|
|
(no details available) |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
|
Time horizon for broad application: now |
| |
|
|
|
|
(no details available) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Expected technological development: dynamic |
| |
|
|
|
|
(no details available) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Motivation:
|
| |
|
|
|
|
- Energy saving
- Passenger comfort
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Benefits (other than environmental): small |
| |
|
|
|
|
Passenger comfort
In some cases an improved insulation of coaches (especially windows)
eliminates heat bridges and thus negative impacts on passenger
comfort. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Barriers: low |
| |
|
|
|
|
Weight reduction efforts There is often a target conflict between weight reduction and coach insulation efforts. The effort to make the coach body lighter usually leads to deteriorated thermal properties, e.g. aluminium coaches tend to have less favourable thermal properties than steel coaches. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Success factors:
|
| |
|
|
|
|
In order to reduce the downtime of passenger coaches, existing retrofit cycles should be used to carry out individual measures for improving coach insulation. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Applicability for railway segments: high |
| |
|
|
|
Type of traction: electric - DC, electric - AC, diesel
|
| |
|
|
|
Type of transportation: passenger - main lines, passenger - high speed, passenger - regional lines, passenger - suburban lines
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(no details available) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Grade of diffusion into railway markets:
|
| |
|
|
|
Diffusion into relevant segment of fleet: not applicable |
| |
|
|
|
Share of newly purchased stock: not applicable |
| |
|
|
|
|
Grade of diffusion is not an applicable criterion because coach insulation is a continuous improvement process rather than a specific technology. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Market potential (railways): high |
| |
|
|
|
|
(no details available) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Example:
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Refitting of B 20-73 at SBB SBB refitted the B 20-73 coach with a bundle of energy saving measures (CO2 -ventilation, coach insulation etc.). Measures for improving the k-value of the coach included a thermal insulation of the outer shell (6 cm Fiberform 40 kg/m3) and ventilation ducts as well as an installation of new glass for windows with argon fill. These measures improved the k-value from the prior 2,06 W/m2 kg to 1,60 W/m2 kg. The retrofit programme reduced total energy consumption (incl. traction) by 14 % and showed a good cost-benefit ratio. |
|
|
Environmental criteria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Impacts on energy efficiency:
|
| |
|
|
|
Energy efficiency potential for single vehicle: 2 - 5% |
| |
|
|
|
Energy efficiency potential throughout fleet: 1 - 2% |
| |
|
|
|
|
General figures on efficiency potential of coach insulation measures are not available. However, given that 20 % of the total energy consumption of a passenger train is needed for comfort functions (mainly heating and cooling) and roughly one third of this value is accounted for by transmission losses, the energy transmitted through the outer shell of the coach will be about 5-10% of the total energy demand. Given the fact that k-values can be improved by some 20 - 40%, it therefore seems reasonable to assume a saving potential of 1 - 4 %. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Other environmental impacts: neutral |
| |
|
|
|
|
The materials used need to be assessed from an LCA point of view. |
|
|
Economic criteria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Vehicle - fix costs: medium |
| |
|
|
|
|
Obviously the costs strongly depend on the individual measures realised. In the case of the retrofit of B 20-73 at SBB, the additional costs for insulation of walls and installation of new glass for windows amounted to 12.800 Swiss Francs (8700 EURO). An additional 800 Francs (550 EURO) was spent for the insulation of ventilation ducts. These costs would be considerably less for a bigger vehicles series. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Vehicle - running costs: significant reduction |
| |
|
|
|
|
(no details available) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Infrastructure - fix costs: none |
| |
|
|
|
|
(no details available) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Infrastructure - running costs: unchanged |
| |
|
|
|
|
(no details available) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Scale effects: low |
| |
|
|
|
|
Certain scale effects are to be expected for the retrofit of large vehicle series. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Amortisation: not applicable |
| |
|
|
|
|
The payback time strongly depends on the individual measures realised but will typically be short to medium. |
|
 |
Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)
|
|
|
Overall rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Overall potential: promising |
| |
|
|
|
Time horizon: short-term |
Technologies
go back to technology list
previous technology 
date created: 2002-10-09
add technology
show overview
show evaluation
show details
print data sheet
print screen
Evaluation briefing
Technology list