|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General information
|
|
|
General criteria
|
|
|
Environmental criteria
|
|
|
Economic criteria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle - fix costs: low |
|
|
|
|
|
Costs for cover are likely to be moderate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle - running costs: significant reduction |
|
|
|
|
|
(no details available) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure - fix costs: (no data) |
|
|
|
|
|
It is not clear whether additional infrastructure would be required for the storage and provision of the covers. This would not be the case for flexible covers permanently integrated into the freight car. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure - running costs: increased |
|
|
|
|
|
The provision of covers at the right spot at the right time would cause additional costs. This would not be the case for flexible covers permanently integrated into the freight car. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scale effects: not applicable |
|
|
|
|
|
(no details available) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortisation: (no data) |
|
|
|
|
|
(no details available) |
|
|
Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)
|
|
|
Overall rating
|