The use of short train-sets which can be combined to trains of variable length raises occupancy and thus allows for a more cost and energy efficient train operation.
Technology field:Increase of load factor and flexible trains
General information
General criteria
Environmental criteria
Economic criteria
Vehicle - fix costs: medium
The seat-specific costs are higher for shorter units since (almost) the same transformer and inverter equipment is needed as for a longer unit. The same is true for the drivers’ cabins. An additional cost effect can arise if trains-sets of different length are ordered, especially if the train design requires a tailored solution, as was the case for 5-coach and 7-coach MUs ordered for the ICE T tilting trains.
However, the increase in seat-specific investment costs will in most cases be overcompensated by less need for seating capacity due to better adaptation of capacity to demand.
Vehicle - running costs: significant reduction
The running costs per passenger-km are substantially reduced due
to
Reduced energy consumption
Reduced maintenance costs (less rolling stock
required)
Infrastructure - fix costs: none
(no details available)
Infrastructure - running costs: increased
More coupling and decoupling processes are required for train formation.
Scale effects: low
(no details available)
Amortisation: strongly dependent on specific application
(no details available)
Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)