|
|
|
|
|
Systematic train delays |
|
evaluated |
|
|
|
After passenger boarding, trains sometimes have to wait in the station until the timetable permits departure. Otherwise this time could be exploited for energy efficient driving. The strategy of systematic train delays is intended to exploit this “lost” time buffer.
|
|
Technology field: Energy efficient driving
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
|
After passenger boarding, trains sometimes have to wait an additional
period of time in the station until the timetable permits departure. This is a
waste of precious time given the importance of time buffers for energy efficient
driving. The strategy of systematic train delays is intended to exploit the time
periods usually wasted in stations. The train is driven according to a “shadow”
schedule which is identical to the “public” schedule at the main stations but
slightly delayed at the intermediate stations. The driver can immediately leave
the station after passenger boarding and has more buffer time for energy
efficient driving strategies. The delays (< 2 min) can be chosen small enough
in order not to bother passengers. This strategy is presented in detail in Euro
Transport Consult 1997. In order to raise customer acceptance, the following
modification is proposed: Instead of consciously delaying train arrival as
foreseen by the above concept, the delay could be shifted to train departure.
This is achieved by reducing standing times in stations: If passenger boarding
is quick, train leaves in time, otherwise departure is slightly delayed. This
modification of the concept could raise acceptance since punctual train arrival
is more relevant for service quality than punctual train
departure. |
|
|
General criteria
|
|
|
Environmental criteria
|
|
|
Economic criteria
|
|
|
Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)
|
|
|
Overall rating
|
date created: 2002-10-09 |
|
|
|
© UIC - International Union of Railways 2003 |
|
|
|