Costs
Investement costs are far too high.
Risk for developers
- R&D in fuel cells is risky for industry (especially railway
manufacturers) since development costs before mass production are particularly
high.
- Development potential uncertain: Some experts hold that hydrogen
technology is over 60 years old and given such a long development period has
not evolved sufficiently in order to justify expensive R&D
efforts.
Technological shortcomings
- Power density is far from sufficient for most railway traction
applications.
- liability to defect and lifetime: one reason for liability to defect lies
in the high number of internal interconnections between fuel cells in the
stack. Lifetime of present fuel cells is ~ 5000 hours.
- Fuel supply and storage: hydrogen storage unsatisfactory, progress too
slow in this area.
- Efficiency: Total efficiency of fuel cell system must be improved in order
to become a diesel alternative.
Range
Present technology could lead to range problems due to low fuel densities.
Environmental
If hydrogen from fossil sources is used and assuming present efficiencies of
fuel cells, environmental balance of fuel cells is worse or at best equal as for
diesel traction (cf. Environmental criteria Other environmental impact).
Infrastructure transition
New infrastructure needed. Gaseous fuel requires more careful handling than
diesel.
Interoperability
Problematic as long as fuel supply infrastructure is not fully deployed.
Safety
Explosiveness of hydrogen-oxygen mixtures. This problem can be considered as
principally solved.
There are restrictions concerning fuel cell powered vehicles in tunnels and
underground service.
Technological inertia
Scepticism rules in both railway and manufacturing companies to deviate from
conventional and successfully technology. |