|
|
|
|
Whereas in conventional diesel engines injection pressure is generated for each injector individually, a common rail engine stores the fuel under high pressure in a central container ("common rail") and delivers it to the individual injectors on demand. Benefits of common rail injection are reduced noise levels, stronger performance, improved emission control and greater efficiency.
|
|
Technology field: Optimisation of traction technologies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General information
|
|
|
General criteria
|
|
|
Environmental criteria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impacts on energy efficiency:
|
|
|
|
|
Energy efficiency potential for single vehicle: > 10% |
|
|
|
|
Energy efficiency potential throughout fleet: 1 - 2% |
|
|
|
|
|
According to manufacturer, the MTU 4000 common rail engine which is fitted for railway applications has a fuel consumption of 195 g/kWh, compared to values between 200 and 250 g/kWh for most diesel engines in service. Improvements in fuel economy to be obtained by common rail technology is highly dependent on point of reference. Automotive manufacturers claim 20% less fuel consumption compared to previous generation of engines (not specified). Compared to other state-of-the-art diesel solutions, improvements will be much smaller. In re-engining programmes for old locomotives, common rail technology may improve fuel economy by up to 30 % compared to 30 year old engines. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other environmental impacts: positive |
|
|
|
|
|
Reduced emission. |
|
|
Economic criteria
|
|
|
Application outside railway sector
|
|
|
Overall rating
|
date created: 2002-10-09 |
|
|
|
© UIC - International Union of Railways 2003 |
|
|
|