 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
General information
|
|
 |
General criteria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Status of development: in use |
|
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
|
Time horizon for broad application: now |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Expected technological development: (no data) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Benefits (other than environmental): medium |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Barriers: medium |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Applicability for railway segments: high |
| |
|
|
|
Type of traction: electric - DC, electric - AC
|
| |
|
|
|
Type of transportation: passenger - main lines, passenger - high speed, passenger - regional lines, passenger - suburban lines, freight
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Grade of diffusion into railway markets:
|
| |
|
|
|
Diffusion into relevant segment of fleet: (no data) |
| |
|
|
|
Share of newly purchased stock: (no data) |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Market potential (railways): high |
|
|
Environmental criteria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Impacts on energy efficiency:
|
| |
|
|
|
Energy efficiency potential for single vehicle: < 2% |
| |
|
|
|
Energy efficiency potential throughout fleet: < 1% |
| |
|
|
|
|
No data on saving effect are available. Given that catenary losses account for about 10% of the energy drawn from substations, and the fact that the control tool regulates the current only within a small range, the overall saving potential will be less than 2%. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Other environmental impacts: neutral |
| |
|
|
|
|
(no details available) |
|
|
Economic criteria
|
|
 |
Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)
|
|
|
Overall rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Overall potential: interesting |
| |
|
|
|
Time horizon: short-term |
Technologies
go back to technology list
previous technology 
date created: 2002-10-09
add technology
show overview
show evaluation
show details
print data sheet
print screen
Evaluation briefing
Technology list