Technologies        
  Hauptmenu
 
    Introduction
    Database
    -  Technologies
  -  Projects
    Calendar
    Discussions
    Contact & Links
    Imprint & Disclaimer
    Sitemap
 
 


     
 
Content
 
back to list go back to technology list      previous previous technology  next technology  next

   Medium-frequency transformer  evaluated  
The main transformer contributes considerably to losses in traction system (especially in 16,7 Hz systems). Modern power electronics allow for a more efficient and much lighter alternative: the medium frequency transformer operating at 400 - 800 Hz or comparable frequencies.
Technology field: Optimisation of traction technologies
close main section General information
  close sub-section Description
   

Principle

Transformers have high losses at low frequencies. In 16 2/3 Hz railway systems transformer losses therefore considerably reduce overall traction efficiency. Modern power electronics allow for a more efficient and much lighter alternative: the medium frequency transformer operating at 400 – 800 Hz or comparable frequencies.

Technical details of prototype developed by DB AG

A cascade of partial IGBT inverters converts catenary current from 16 2/3 Hz to 400 Hz. Each cascade module consists of two four-quadrant-controls connected by a DC link. Each module supplies one coil of the transformer operating at 400 Hz. The secondary side of the latter consists of only one coil directly connected to the rectifier and the usual motor inverters. The load-side rectifier has to be adapted to 400 Hz. This is the only modification required.

The medium frequency transformer is inherently multi-system operable. In order to use different AC or DC supply, it suffices to modify the software controlling the catenary-side inverters.

The medium frequency transformer allows a backwards power flow needed for regenerative braking.

Table 1: Technical data of a typical medium frequency transformer:

Power 1 MVA
Short circuit voltage 18,9%
Efficiency 96,2 %
Frequency 400 Hz
Transmission ratio 1:1
Number of primary coils 16
Number of secondary coils 2
Mass 450 kg

Source: Kunz 1999

Fields of application

Railways: Traction and auxiliary transformers

Energy supply grids: A similar transformer concept is discussed for the distribution transformers in energy supply grids, but involved voltages and lay-out impede comparability.

Manufacturer

DB AG (prototype)

First studies at Alstom, Siemens etc.

close main section General criteria
  close sub-section Status of development: test series
   
  • German DB developed a prototype of medium frequency transformer with 1 MVA permanent power for 15 kV 16 2/3 Hz system. Transformers of this power class are used in EMUs on local lines. The prototype has undergone stationary testing, integration into a vehicle for driving tests is planned (as of 1999).
  • Alstom is going to continue the development begun by DB.
  • There is also medium frequency technology for auxiliary power converters. This technology is however not considered here.
  Time horizon for broad application: in > 10 years
    Manufacturers estimate 2-3 year development time after kick-off. The medium frequency transformer could be produced in series some time between 2005 and 2010. To become a standard in new stock it would then take approx. another decade.
  Expected technological development: highly dynamic
    Eddy currents limited the DB prototype to 96,2 % efficiency (without power electronics). Replacing aluminium by copper parts, the transformer itself (without power electronics) could reach 98,5 % efficiency according to DB experts. This would raise efficiency of the whole component (including the required power electronics) to 94 %. In long-term perspective power electronics might altogether replace the on-board transformer.
    Motivation:
   

Weight and volume

The under-floor space for integrating the main transformer into an EMU is very limited. Small and light transformer technlogy is therefore an important requirement for decentralized traction.

Multi-system operability

The medium frequency transformer is inherently multi-system operable.

Energy efficiency

is a positive side effect.

  Benefits (other than environmental): big
   

Volume reduction

The small dimensions of medium frequency transformers are ideally fitted for EMUs because of limited build-in space.

Mass reduction

The advantages of a reduced transformer mass are numerous and range from advantages for car-body construction (less shear stress require less car-body stabilisation measures) to reduced wear.

Multi-system operability

The medium frequency transformer is inherently multi-system operable.

  Barriers: medium
    Complexity High amount of power electronics. Very complex compared to conventional transformer. Main problem: Ensure operational reliability despite complexity. Can be solved by redundant construction: individual cascade modules may be switched off if broken down.
    Success factors:
    (no details available)
  Applicability for railway segments: high
    Type of traction:  electric - AC
    Type of transportation:  passenger - main lines, passenger - high speed, passenger - regional lines, passenger - suburban lines, freight
    Main benefits in 16 2/3 Hz systems but conceivable for all electric vehicles. Ideal transformer solution for EMUs due to small dimensions.
    Grade of diffusion into railway markets:
  Diffusion into relevant segment of fleet: 0 %
  Share of newly purchased stock: 0 %
    (no details available)
  Market potential (railways): highly uncertain
    (no details available)
    Example:
    (no details available)
close main section Environmental criteria
  close sub-section Impacts on energy efficiency:
  Energy efficiency potential for single vehicle: 2 - 5%
  Energy efficiency potential throughout fleet: 1 - 2%
   

Medium frequency transformers cut energy consumption by increasing efficiency and reducing vehicle mass (all numbers refer to 16 2/3 Hz systems):

Efficiency effect

Efficiency of medium frequency transformers: > 94% (Efficiency of conventional transformers: ~ 92%)

Transformer efficiency (and with it the overall efficiency of power train) increased by 2 – 3%. It is assumed that the same efficiency gain can be obtained for higher power classes as well, e.g. high-speed trains or freight locomotives.

Efficiency gains in 50 Hz systems will be lower. Specific numbers are not available.

 

Traction

Brake energy recovery

Effect on efficiency of power train

Elasticity with regard to efficiency of power train

Effect on
total energy consumption for traction

High speed train

Electric

no

2 – 3 %

1,00

2 – 3 %

 

(16,7 Hz)

yes

1,11

2 – 3 %

Intercity train

Electric

no

1,00

2 – 3 %

 

(16,7 Hz)

yes

1,12

2 – 3 %

Regional train

Electric

no

1,00

2 – 3 %

 

(16,7 Hz)

yes

1,33

3 – 4 %

Suburban train

Electric

no

1,00

2 – 3 %

 

(16,7 Hz)

yes

1,42

3 – 4 %

Freight

Electric(16,7 Hz)

no

1,00

2 – 3 %

Range:

2 – 4 %

Mass effect

DB prototype about 40 – 50% lighter than conventional transformer.

Mass of conventional transformer in this power class: ~ 1 ton. Mass of trains in this power class: ~ 100 tons.

Typical mass reduction: ~ 0.5% of train mass.

 

Traction

Brake energy recovery

Effect on train mass

Elasticity with regard to train mass

Effect on
total energy consumption for traction

Suburban train

Electric

no

0,5 %

0,64

0,3 %

 

(16,7 Hz)

yes

0,5 %

0,57

0,3 %

Mass effects in other power classes are difficult to assess as long as no prototypes exist. The case of suburban trains however shows that the additional effect through mass reduction is small compared to the efficiency effect.

Overall effect

Judging by ongoing R&D, medium frequency transformers may save up to 3 % in main line and up to 4 % in regional line vehicles (in 16 2/3 Hz systems)

Fleet-wide effect

MFT is only applicable to AC traction, and benefits are highest for 16,7 Hz systems. No data are available to determine whether application in 50 Hz systems is reasonable.

Estimated overall energy efficiency potential (in 16,7 Hz systems): 1 – 2 %.

  Other environmental impacts: neutral
    (no details available)
close main section Economic criteria
  close sub-section Vehicle - fix costs: medium
    (no details available)
  Vehicle - running costs: significant reduction
    Energy costs are appreciably reduced in 16,7 Hz systems.
  Infrastructure - fix costs: none
    (no details available)
  Infrastructure - running costs: unchanged
    (no details available)
  Scale effects: medium
    (no details available)
  Amortisation: (no data)
    (no details available)
no data available Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)
close main section Overall rating
  close sub-section Overall potential: very promising
  Time horizon: long-term
    Medium-frequency transformers represent an interesting lane of development towards more efficient transformers, an issue especially relevant in 16,7 Hz systems. Profitability in 50 Hz systems has to be assessed carefully. Present states of development do not yet allow a decision as to whether medium-frequency or HTSC transformer technology is the more attractive option.
References / Links:  Kunz et al. 1999
Attachments:
Related projects:
Contact persons:
 date created: 2002-10-09
 
 
© UIC - International Union of Railways 2003
 
Aktionmenu
 
 Your contribution
   add technology
 Views of this page
   show overview
   show evaluation
   show details
 Print options
   print data sheet
   print screen
 Help
   Evaluation briefing
   Technology list
    French - German