Technologies        
  Hauptmenu
 
    Introduction
    Database
    -  Technologies
  -  Projects
    Calendar
    Discussions
    Contact & Links
    Imprint & Disclaimer
    Sitemap
 
 


     
 
Content
 
back to list go back to technology list      previous previous technology  next technology  next

   Double-decked stock  evaluated  
Double-decked trains have 20-40% more seating capacity per train length leading to positive impacts on energy efficiency and cost effectiveness.
Technology field: Space utilisation
open main section General information
open main section General criteria
close main section Environmental criteria
  close sub-section Impacts on energy efficiency:
  Energy efficiency potential for single vehicle: > 10%
  Energy efficiency potential throughout fleet: > 5%
   

In order to estimate the reduction of seat-specific energy consumption, single-decked and double-decked versions of an otherwise identical train (e.g. equal length etc) are compared.

Aerodynamic effect of higher car body

The cross-section of the train is increased by ~20%. Since air resistance grows with cross-sectional area in a less than proportional way, it is safe to assume that air resistance grows in the order of 10% or less.

Mass effect of higher car body

Double-decked trains are heavier than single-decked trains. The mass increment per train length is of about 10% (e.g. 11% according to a design study by Reemtsema et al. 1997).

Comfort functions

No data are available on the effect on the energy consumption of comfort functions in a double-decked train. For obvious reasons (less wall surface per seat, less interior space to be heated per seat etc), it is increased by less than the relative increase in seating capacity. 10% will be a safe upper limit here as well.

Energy consumption of the entire train

Since all components of energy consumption of a passenger train (mass, air drag and comfort energy) are increased by about 10% or less, the energy consumption will also increase by 10% or less.

Seat-specific energy demand

Since seating capacity is increased by about 20-45%, the 110% energy consumption have to be divided by 1.2 and 1.45 to get the range of seat-specific energy demand relative to a conventional car design. The result is a reduction of seat-specific energy consumption by 8% - 24%.

TGV Duplex

French TGV Duplex can be seen as a benchmark: seating capacity has been increased by 45% as compared to a single-decked train of the same length (e.g. the TVG "Réseau"). SNCF claims that this comes at virtually no increase in energy demand which means that seat-specific energy consumption is reduced by over 30%.

Fleet-wide potential

Assuming that a more than half of the regional and local lines and some of the main lines could be operated with double-decked stock in long term, there is a fleet-wide saving potential of over 5 %.

  Other environmental impacts: neutral
    (no details available)
open main section Economic criteria
no data available Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)
open main section Overall rating
References / Links:  Euro Transport Consult 1997;  Reemtsema, Kurz 1997;  Andersson, Berg 1999;  Moreau 1998
Attachments:
Related projects:  New double-decked Regiorunners
Contact persons:
 date created: 2002-10-09
 
 
© UIC - International Union of Railways 2003
 
Aktionmenu
 
 Your contribution
   add technology
 Views of this page
   show overview
   show evaluation
   show details
 Print options
   print data sheet
   print screen
 Help
   Evaluation briefing
   Technology list
    French - German