Technologies        
  Hauptmenu
 
    Introduction
    Database
    -  Technologies
  -  Projects
    Calendar
    Discussions
    Contact & Links
    Imprint & Disclaimer
    Sitemap
 
 


     
 
Content
 
back to list go back to technology list      previous previous technology  next technology  next

   Double-decked stock  evaluated  
Double-decked trains have 20-40% more seating capacity per train length leading to positive impacts on energy efficiency and cost effectiveness.
Technology field: Space utilisation
open main section General information
close main section General criteria
  close sub-section Status of development: in use
   

 

  Time horizon for broad application: now
   

 

  Expected technological development: basically exploited
    Double-decked stock is a mature vehicle concept. Some remaining minor challenges such as pressure tightness on high-speed lines with tunnels, can be solved in short or mid term.
    Motivation:
    Capacity
  Benefits (other than environmental): medium
   

Compared to normal trains:

Since platform lengths in stations are limited (300 m in regional and 400 m in main-line stations), double-decked stock is a means to increase the capacity of a line without increasing train frequency or investing into the construction of longer platforms.

Compared to wide-body trains:

  • Better compatibility with infrastructure
  Barriers: high
   

Passenger comfort

Seating comfort on the seats adjacent to the walls is slightly reduced due to restricted space for legs on the lower deck. This is not problematic in regional or suburban transport where average trips are short. In high-speed trains comfort issues are more relevant and could be an obstacle for double-decked stock. However, existing double-decked high-speed trains in France, Japan and elsewhere are widely accepted by passengers.

Ambulant catering

The staircases pose a problem for a mobile bistro service and for the mobility of passengers in general. In the Swiss IC 2000, a stair-free upper deck has been realized for these reasons.

Boarding times

Due to the stairs the boarding times at stations are increased with double-decked stock. This should be taken into account by operators in the timetable design. For the same reason, mixed operation of double-decked and single-decked stock should be avoided as far as possible.

Technological

  • Pressure-tightness: Double-decked high-speed trains must show a high degree of pressure-tightness. Especially when entering tunnels, pressure waves must not enter the passenger coaches to avoid danger of burst ear-drums. Pressure-tight high-speed stock is still a challenge for manufacturers. Therefore, DB double-deckers may not exceed 160 km/h. TGVs are not confronted with this problem since there are no tunnels in the TGV infrastructure.
  • Tilting is not possible for current double-decked stock

Infrastructure

One of the main obstacles for the introduction of double-decked stock is its incompatibility with parts of the infrastructure, especially tunnels. However, in many regional networks or in flat topography, double-decked stock can be used without any limitations.

    Success factors:
   

 

  Applicability for railway segments: high
    Type of traction:  electric - DC, electric - AC, diesel
    Type of transportation:  passenger - main lines, passenger - high speed, passenger - regional lines, passenger - suburban lines
   

Double-decked solutions exist for all types of passenger trains. Main limitations to its applicability are:

  • incompatibility with infrastructure (tunnels etc.)
  • lines requiring tilting cannot be operated with double-deckers
    Grade of diffusion into railway markets:
  Diffusion into relevant segment of fleet: 5 - 20%
  Share of newly purchased stock: < 20%
   

 

  Market potential (railways): high
   

 

    Example:
   
  • TGV Duplex
  • Shinkansen E1.
  • IC 2000
open main section Environmental criteria
open main section Economic criteria
no data available Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)
open main section Overall rating
References / Links:  Euro Transport Consult 1997;  Reemtsema, Kurz 1997;  Andersson, Berg 1999;  Moreau 1998
Attachments:
Related projects:  New double-decked Regiorunners
Contact persons:
 date created: 2002-10-09
 
 
© UIC - International Union of Railways 2003
 
Aktionmenu
 
 Your contribution
   add technology
 Views of this page
   show overview
   show evaluation
   show details
 Print options
   print data sheet
   print screen
 Help
   Evaluation briefing
   Technology list
    French - German