Technologies        
  Hauptmenu
 
    Introduction
    Database
    -  Technologies
  -  Projects
    Calendar
    Discussions
    Contact & Links
    Imprint & Disclaimer
    Sitemap
 
 


     
 
Content
 
back to list go back to technology list      previous previous technology  next technology  next

   Articulated trains (Jakob-type bogies)  evaluated  
Whereas conventional stock consists of individual carriages resting on two bogies each, articulated trains consist of a fixed composition of coaches with consecutive cars resting on shared bogies. This considerably reduces train weight per length.
Technology field: Mass reduction
open main section General information
close main section General criteria
  close sub-section Status of development: in use
    Jakob-type bogies are successfully used in many railways. Examples are TGV, IC3, Talent and Desiro.
  Time horizon for broad application: now
    (no details available)
  Expected technological development: basically exploited
    (no details available)
    Motivation:
    Weight reduction
  Benefits (other than environmental): big
   

Train design and passenger comfort

Due to less train length car-bodies of articulated trains can be 10-20 cm wider than those of conventional trains for the same track and tunnel profiles. This improves seating comfort in 2 2 second class seating and allows to extend 2 2 seating (rather than 2  1 seating) to first class sections. Since car ends rest on joint bogies they do not sway out in curves. Due to this fact, interior car transitions can be designed to be wider than in conventional stock.

Weight reduction

Besides reduced energy consumption, weight reduction leads to higher acceleration rates for given traction power which is especially relevant in high-speed service.

  Barriers: high
   

Infrastructure

Since articulated trains form fixed car sets and cannot be easily decoupled into single cars, they put special requirements on the operator especially when it comes to maintenance and repairs. For most articulated trains very long maintenance workshops are needed (typically 150 m). This is one of the main reasons, why countries like Germany and Switzerland are reluctant to introduce main-line trains with Jakob-type bogies. However, depending on the existing infrastructure of the operator and the actual length of the train sets, the introduction does not always have to create major transition costs for the operator (cf. General criteria - Example).

Flexibility of train composition

In addition, the fixed train composition leads to less flexibility in train length. However, conventional MUs have the same restriction since traction components are distributed along the train-set and therefore the train cannot be decoupled into autonomous units. In both cases, the solution is to achieve flexibility by having short train sets that may be combined to form trains of variable length.

Axle load

Since the total weight is shared by less axles, articulated trains require additional lightweight efforts in order to keep axle-load below 16 tons.

    Success factors:
    (no details available)
  Applicability for railway segments: high
    Type of traction:  electric - DC, electric - AC, diesel
    Type of transportation:  passenger - main lines, passenger - high speed, passenger - regional lines, passenger - suburban lines
    (no details available)
    Grade of diffusion into railway markets:
  Diffusion into relevant segment of fleet: 5 - 20%
  Share of newly purchased stock: (no data)
    (no details available)
  Market potential (railways): medium
    In general, articulated trains offer a number of advantages, especially low weight. However, many operators fear high transition costs, at least in main-line fleet. Nevertheless, there is a considerable market for stock with Jakob-type bogies.
    Example:
   

IC3 at DSB

On a great part of their main line passenger service, DSB relies on the IC3, a diesel-mechanic train with Jakob-bogies. Before introducing the articulated train, it was checked if the workshops were prepared, especially as far as lifting of the whole train-set is concerned. Due to relatively short train-sets (59 meters), the transition efforts were limited.

open main section Environmental criteria
open main section Economic criteria
no data available Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)
open main section Overall rating
References / Links:
Attachments:
Related projects:
Contact persons:
 date created: 2002-10-09
 
 
© UIC - International Union of Railways 2003
 
Aktionmenu
 
 Your contribution
   add technology
 Views of this page
   show overview
   show evaluation
   show details
 Print options
   print data sheet
   print screen
 Help
   Evaluation briefing
   Technology list
    French - German