Technologies        
  Hauptmenu
 
    Introduction
    Database
    -  Technologies
  -  Projects
    Calendar
    Discussions
    Contact & Links
    Imprint & Disclaimer
    Sitemap
 
 


     
 
Content
 
back to list go back to technology list      previous previous technology  next technology  next

   Regenerative braking in DC systems  evaluated  
Electric stock may recuperate energy during braking by using traction motors as generators. In DC supply systems (1,5 and 3 kV) high recovery rates are only achievable under favourable conditions.
Technology field: Regenerative braking and energy management
open main section General information
open main section General criteria
close main section Environmental criteria
  close sub-section Impacts on energy efficiency:
  Energy efficiency potential for single vehicle: 5 - 10%
  Energy efficiency potential throughout fleet: > 5%
   

Share of recoverable energy:

Share of recoverable energy heavily depends on speed and stopping pattern.

The following values are typical (referring to total energy demand) for different operation types

Main lines: 15%

Regional lines: 35 %

Suburban lines: 45%

Freight lines: 20%

The recovery rate actually reached in operation only exploits a part of this potential. This is due to several reasons:

  • Efficiency of backwards power train: The recoverable energy can never be fully regenerated due to losses in backwards power train. Backwards efficiency is comparable to traction efficiency (~ 90%).
  • Receptivity of catenary: The supply system may be „non-receptive“ because no other train is close enough to use it. In DC systems, this is frequently the case (cf. General criteria – barriers).
  • Braking power: Many times the electric braking power is not sufficient and blended braking (cf. Description) is applied. Especially in freight operation, the electric brakes are usually insufficient for braking the entire train.

There is little (if any) quantitative data on these effects. The following table gives some estimates (!) for DC systems. Since the main obstacle is limited receptivity of catenary, the table gives the potential to be exploited with additional technologies (cf. General criteria – success factors) and the potential to be exploited without additional technologies:

Theoretical potential Correction due to traction efficiency Correction due to blended braking Potential if additional technologies are used Correction due to non-receptive catenary Potential without additional technology
Main lines

15%

0,9

0,8

11%

0,2

2%

Regional lines

35%

0,9

0,8

25%

0,4

10%

Local lines

45%

0,9

0,8

32%

0,5

16%

Freight lines

20%

0,9

0,5

14%

0,2

3%

Source: IZT

A part of the potential given in the last column is already exploited at present. So the remaining potential without additional technology will be around 1 - 5%. If innovative technology (cf. General criteria – success factors) is implemented, there is a saving potential of 5 – 20 % depending on the specific situation.

  Other environmental impacts: neutral
    (no details available)
open main section Economic criteria
no data available Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)
open main section Overall rating
References / Links:  Andersson 2000;  Moninger, Gunselmann 1998;  Piro (no year);  Moninger (no year)
Attachments:
Related projects:  Choppers for Sprinter train sets;  New double-decked Regiorunners;  Studies performed on energy storage systems
Contact persons:
 date created: 2002-10-09
 
 
© UIC - International Union of Railways 2003
 
Aktionmenu
 
 Your contribution
   add technology
 Views of this page
   show overview
   show evaluation
   show details
 Print options
   print data sheet
   print screen
 Help
   Evaluation briefing
   Technology list
    French - German