Technologies        
  Hauptmenu
 
    Introduction
    Database
    -  Technologies
  -  Projects
    Calendar
    Discussions
    Contact & Links
    Imprint & Disclaimer
    Sitemap
 
 


     
 
Content
 
back to list go back to technology list      previous previous technology  next technology  next

   Swissmetro  evaluated  
Swissmetro is an innovative magnetic transportation concept of high speed trains running inside partially evacuated underground tubes with speeds between 300 and 500 kilometres per hour. Some experts see Swissmetro as a promising alternative to both air and ground high-speed transportation.
Technology field: Non-conventional trains (Maglev etc.)
close main section General information
  close sub-section Description
   

Swissmetro is a magnetic transportation system running inside partially evacuated underground tubes. The system could achieve speeds between 300 and 500 kilometres per hour, which comes close to the lower range of short-haul air traffic. Some experts see Swissmetro as an environmentally very attractive alternative to both air and ground high-speed transportation, since noise pollution and energy consumption as well as negative impacts on residential areas and the landscape could be substantially lower.

The idea of the Swissmetro dates back to the 1970s and has since been studied by scientists at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL). In 1992 the Swissmetro Company SA was founded to collect the funding necessary for further R&D on the Swissmetro.

The Swissmetro was originally discussed as a rapid means of transportation between Swiss metropolitan areas. At present there is a concept called "Eurometro" which studies the potential for a Swissmetro system connecting major European cities.

Technical details

  • the most important aspects of the Swissmetro system are:
  • Underground infrastructure, consisting of two tunnel tubes of 5 m interior diameter each that in the case of the pilot line between Geneva and Lausanne run at a depth of between 60 and 300 meters.
  • Production of partial vacuum in the tunnel tubes (corresponding to the pressure at about 18,000 m above sea level being the traffic altitude of the Concorde) in order to reduce air drag
  • The pressurised vehicles are planned to have a length of 80 m, an external diameter of 3.2 m, and a seating capacity of 200 persons. Due to the pressure difference, boarding at stations has to be supported by a sophisticated system of automatic doors and galleries
  • The propulsion system for the vehicle is based on linear electric motors, allowing speeds in the order of up to 500 kilometers per hour.
  • Magnetic levitation and guidance system (comparable to Maglev)
close main section General criteria
  open sub-section Status of development: research & experiments
  Time horizon for broad application: in > 10 years
  Expected technological development: highly dynamic
  Benefits (other than environmental): big
  Barriers: high
  Applicability for railway segments: medium
    Type of traction:  not applicable
    Type of transportation:  passenger - high speed
    Grade of diffusion into railway markets:
  Diffusion into relevant segment of fleet: 0 %
  Share of newly purchased stock: 0 %
  Market potential (railways): highly uncertain
close main section Environmental criteria
  close sub-section Impacts on energy efficiency:
  Energy efficiency potential for single vehicle: (no data)
  Energy efficiency potential throughout fleet: (no data)
   

An extensive study on the environmental impact of Swissmetro has been conducted by the National Research Programme 41 in Switzerland (Ernst, Geisel et al. 2000). Concerning energy consumption the study yielded the following results:

Comparison Swissmetro – Air traffic

On an assumed pilot route Frankfurt-Rome, the primary energy consumption per person kilometer of Swissmetro would be 5 to 10 times less than in air traffic. The exact factor depends both on actual passenger numbers for the Swissmetro and on the efficiency gains in air transportation (that could be as high as 50% in the next 50 years according to some experts). This assessment includes the so called "grey energy" needed to construct the infrastructure. The (electric) energy demand for operation only was calculated to be

0,185 MJ/pkm for an assumed 76.000 passengers/day

0,21 MJ/pkm for an assumed 38.000 passengers/day

Comparison Swissmetro – conventional high speed rail systems

The energy consumption (for operation only) of the Swissmetro would be roughly 50 % less than both in conventional high-speed rail systems (e.g. ICE) and in ground-level Maglev/Transrapid system. This comparison refers to equal speeds.

Influencing factors

The following factors are especially relevant for energy demand of a Swissmetro system:

  • Tunnel width: The wider the tunnel tube, the less air drag is encountered by Siwssmetro vehicle. Even if the additional energy for tunnel excavation is included in the calculation, a wider tunnel profile is favourable for energy efficiency
  • Degree of evacuation: The less air pressure, the less air drag in the tube. There is however an evacuation limit given by safety considerations.
  Other environmental impacts: ambivalent
    The overall environmental balance strongly depends on the type of transportation, one compares the swissmetro with. Compared to conventional high speed railways, noise emission of Swissmetro is practically zero due to its underground tracks. Area consumption is also reduced, on the other hand this is paid for by an immense excavation effort.
close main section Economic criteria
  open sub-section Vehicle - fix costs: high
  Vehicle - running costs: (no data)
  Infrastructure - fix costs: high
  Infrastructure - running costs: (no data)
  Scale effects: (no data)
  Amortisation: (no data)
no data available Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)
close main section Overall rating
  close sub-section Overall potential: interesting
  Time horizon: long-term
    Swissmetro is a highly innovative concept for future high speed passenger transport worth considering. As such it is still affected by many uncertainties. Environmental performance could be convincing if one takes into account that such a system could gain back some market share from air transport. Major obstacle will be high initial investment.
References / Links:  Ernst et al. 2000;  www.swissmetro.com
Attachments:
Related projects:
Contact persons:
 date created: 2002-10-09
 
 
© UIC - International Union of Railways 2003
 
Aktionmenu
 
 Your contribution
   add technology
 Views of this page
   show overview
   show evaluation
   show details
 Print options
   print data sheet
   print screen
 Help
   Evaluation briefing
   Technology list
    French - German