![]() |
![]() |
||||||||
|
![]() |
Several energy saving measures depend on the co-operation of personnel. This problem can be effectively addressed by training programmes. |
![]() |
Technology field: Management and organisation |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
General information | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Description | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Several energy saving measures, including some of the most promising ones (e.g. regenerative brakes or driving advice systems), heavily depend on the collaboration of personnel. The two main strategies to address this problem are
The following will be concerned with training programs. Training units on energy saving can be given in special dedicated seminars or included as a special focus of existing training programmes for personnel. Drivers are the main target group of energy efficiency training, but personnel at stations who is responsible for punctual train departure as well as personnel in charge of parking mode during stand-still could also be addressed by such a measure. Energy efficiency strategies which strongly depend on the co-operation of personnel include:
|
||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
General criteria | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Status of development: in use | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
DB AG and others have realised training measures to raise drivers' awareness for energy efficiency. | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Time horizon for broad application: now | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Expected technological development: not applicable | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Motivation: | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Energy saving | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Benefits (other than environmental): small | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Motivation of drivers Training programmes can have a positive effect on motivation of personnel by showing to personnel that their behaviour matters and that they play a major role in the success of new technologies and achievement of environmental goals. This is especially important in view of the growing degree of external train control and automation in many fields of train operation. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Barriers: low | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Costs Costs of training programs include direct costs of the programme and indirect costs through personnel being off duty while attending seminars. Acceptance Training seminars often meet scepticism due to doubts about the effectiveness of such a measure. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Success factors: | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Costs of training can be reduced by including an energy efficiency training unit into existing training programmes instead of carrying out dedicated programmes for energy matters only. This will reduce the time personnel is off duty, but may also affect the overall effectiveness of the measure. | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Applicability for railway segments: high | ||
![]() |
![]() |
Type of traction: electric - DC, electric - AC, diesel | |||
![]() |
![]() |
Type of transportation: passenger - main lines, passenger - high speed, passenger - regional lines, passenger - suburban lines, freight | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Grade of diffusion into railway markets: | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Diffusion into relevant segment of fleet: not applicable | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Share of newly purchased stock: not applicable | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Market potential (railways): not applicable | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Example: | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
Environmental criteria | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Impacts on energy efficiency: | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Energy efficiency potential for single vehicle: not applicable | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Energy efficiency potential throughout fleet: (no data) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Studies conducted at DB AG reveal high effectiveness of programs aiming at raised awareness of drivers. Both overall energy consumption and recuperation rate show significant differences for an individual service before and after realising a training program. However, the verification of the effectiveness of such a measure is often difficult since trained drivers will show a better performance if they are accompanied for evaluation purposes than in normal work. | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Other environmental impacts: neutral | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
Economic criteria | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Vehicle - fix costs: not applicable | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Training programs are cost-intensive:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Vehicle - running costs: significant reduction | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Infrastructure - fix costs: none | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Infrastructure - running costs: unchanged | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Scale effects: none | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Amortisation: < 1 year | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Empirical data on the payback of training measures is not available. However, given the good experience at DB AG, it seems reasonable to assume that in most cases the costs of special training programmes pay off in less than one year. | ||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific) | ||||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
Overall rating | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Overall potential: very promising | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Time horizon: short-term | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Training programmes for raising awareness of personnel are an effective short-term measure to improve energy efficiency of railway operation. Experience at DB AG is promising and could help to overcome scepticism about the effectiveness of such a measure. |
![]() |
References / Links: |
![]() |
Attachments: |
![]() |
Related projects: Contest Energy optimisation of "Metropolitan" trains; EnergieSparen (Energy saving) |
![]() |
Contact persons: |
![]() |
![]() |
© UIC - International Union of Railways 2003 |