![]() |
![]() |
||||||||
|
![]() |
Parked passenger trains are often heated all night. This consumes substantial amounts of energy. A possible solution is the development and implementation of an intelligent control tool for parked trains. |
![]() |
Technology field: Optimisation of comfort functions |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
General information | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Description | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Under cold outside conditions, parked trains are heated and lighted partly or completely overnight for several reasons:
In countries of Central and Northern Europe, overnight standstill consumes considerable amounts of energy. Existing solutions to reduce this energy consumption include:
This evaluation focuses on automatic control systems. Technical details No general system specifications for an automatic control of overnight operation of comfort functions in trains can be given since on-board control of comfort functions is highly heterogeneous. Existing solutions mainly differ with respect to the following features:
This heterogeneity of operation concepts makes any standard solution difficult. |
||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
General criteria | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Status of development: in use | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Many railway companies apply control devices to reduce the energy demand during overnight standstill to a certain degree. This includes the use of simple timers etc. | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Time horizon for broad application: 2 - 5 years | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Expected technological development: dynamic | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Especially in the field of telematic control solutions, the technological development potential is still high. | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Motivation: | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Energy saving | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Benefits (other than environmental): none | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Barriers: medium | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Organisation The coaches have to be warm when the trains are cleaned. However the time the cleaning personnel arrives varies too much to program the timer in a way to take this into consideration. Due to low salaries, the motivation of cleaning personnel to collaborate in such measures is generally low. Heterogeneity of stock and stand-still facilities The on-board equipment for controlling comfort functions are highly variable between vehicles. This impedes the development of a generalized automatic control with big scale effects. Acceptance by management As long as no metering equipment is in place to measure energy consumption during standstill, it is difficult to make a cost-benefit analysis and to convince management. Danger of freezing Some operators are reluctant to switch off heating in the night due to the danger of freezing and damage to equipment. DSB has discussed installing a timer to reduce the coach temperature to 5°C during the night and then automatically raise it to 22°C before service. However, it could not be ruled out that in exceptionally cold periods the inside temperature would fall below 5°C with consequences such as water freezing in the toilets etc. Therefore the measure was not implemented in the end. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Success factors: | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Applicability for railway segments: high | ||
![]() |
![]() |
Type of traction: electric - DC, electric - AC, diesel | |||
![]() |
![]() |
Type of transportation: passenger - main lines, passenger - high speed, passenger - regional lines, passenger - suburban lines | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Grade of diffusion into railway markets: | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Diffusion into relevant segment of fleet: 5 - 20% | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Share of newly purchased stock: not applicable | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Market potential (railways): high | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Example: | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
PLC system at SJ An automatic control for overnight standstill is currently studied in Sweden. The so called PLC system (Programmable Logistic Control) will optimise the use of electricity so that heat and light is minimised during parking hours, but automatically switched back on well before service starts again. During service the temperature lies between 18 and 20° C. When service ends, coach temperature is lowered to 12° C, and raised again to service temperature one hour before service start. This is done fully automatically. In order to avoid failures everything is built in twice. |
||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
Environmental criteria | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Impacts on energy efficiency: | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Energy efficiency potential for single vehicle: 2 - 5% | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Energy efficiency potential throughout fleet: 2 - 5% | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
According to different sources, in countries of Central and Northern Europe energy consumption during standstill is up to 10% of the total energy demand for train operation. In Mediterranean countries, the share will be lower. It is a reasonable estimate to assume that this energy can be reduced by ~ 50% by an intelligent control system. So the saving potential is about 2 - 5 % per vehicle. This estimate may be even rather conservative compared to calculations made by SJ in the context of their introduction of the PLC system. The operator estimated a saving potential of 15.000 kWh per year and coach. Given the total consumption for coach heating of about 55.000 kWh per year and coach, the measure is expected to save between 20 and 30% of the energy consumed for heating. Since heating energy (including both during standstill and operation) makes up about 20-30% of the total energy consumption of a train, the saving potential of the measure (with respect to the vehicle’s total energy consumption) is therefore between 4 and 9 % per vehicle. This is realistic in Scandinavian countries but would be too optimistic for countries like France or Italy. | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Other environmental impacts: neutral | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
Economic criteria | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Vehicle - fix costs: low | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The installation of an automatic control tool is rather cheap as long as rolling stock offers a convenient interface for such a system, e.g. a central control for the comfort functions. | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Vehicle - running costs: significant reduction | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Infrastructure - fix costs: low | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Infrastructure - running costs: unchanged | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Scale effects: low | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Scale effects will be low due to heterogeneity of stock. | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Amortisation: < 1 year | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Very short amortisation periods. | ||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific) | ||||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
Overall rating | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Overall potential: very promising | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Time horizon: mid-term | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
An automated control of comfort functions in parked trains is seen as a very effective mid-term means to save energy in passenger operation. The saving potential is very high in Central and Northern European countries and medium in Southern Europe. The two main barriers lie in the heterogeneity of rolling stock and organisational hurdles such as variable hours of cleaning personnel. Therefore a successful development and implementation of such a system has to be preceded by a thorough assessment of types of passenger coaches and operational practice in the treatment of parked trains. |
![]() |
References / Links: |
![]() |
Attachments: |
![]() |
Related projects: PLC system on parked trains |
![]() |
Contact persons: |
![]() |
![]() |
© UIC - International Union of Railways 2003 |