![]() |
![]() |
||||||||
|
![]() |
Due to high average weights of freight trains and the fact that only locomotive axles are powered, high shares of braking power comes from the mechanical brakes in the freight cars, and only a small share is added by the locomotive itself. Based on conventional freight trains, there exists limited potential to raise the share of recovered braking energy. |
![]() |
Technology field: Regenerative braking and energy management |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
General information | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Description | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
This evaluation refers to the general potential for an increased share of regenerative braking in freight trains. Therefore, many evaluation categories are not applicable as such. Regenerative braking in freight vs. passenger operation Compared to passenger stock the potential for regenerative braking in freight trains is very limited. The main reason is the lower ratio of powered to unpowered axles.
Limits to braking power of freight locomotives The braking power of freight locomotives is limited by
Strategies to increase the share of regenerative braking
|
||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
General criteria | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Status of development: not applicable | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Time horizon for broad application: not applicable | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Expected technological development: not applicable | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Motivation: | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Benefits (other than environmental): medium | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Reduced wear of brakes | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Barriers: high | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Regenerative braking in freight trains meets the following limitations and barriers (described in more detail in Description):
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Success factors: | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Assessment of status quo A thorough assessment of status quo is needed for each fleet to identify potential to be exploited without major technological investment. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Applicability for railway segments: high | ||
![]() |
![]() |
Type of traction: electric - DC, electric - AC | |||
![]() |
![]() |
Type of transportation: freight | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Grade of diffusion into railway markets: | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Diffusion into relevant segment of fleet: not applicable | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Share of newly purchased stock: not applicable | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Market potential (railways): not applicable | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Example: | |||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
Environmental criteria | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Impacts on energy efficiency: | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Energy efficiency potential for single vehicle: (no data) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Energy efficiency potential throughout fleet: (no data) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Regenerative braking potential in freight trains will be in most cases < 5 % (cf. for example Henning et al. 2000). Data on current share of exploitation of this potential is not available. | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Other environmental impacts: neutral | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
Economic criteria | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Vehicle - fix costs: low | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Vehicle - running costs: minor reduction | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Infrastructure - fix costs: none | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Infrastructure - running costs: unchanged | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Scale effects: not applicable | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Amortisation: not applicable | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
(no details available) | ||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific) | ||||
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
Overall rating | ||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Overall potential: interesting | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Time horizon: short-term | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Potential for increased use of regenerative braking in freight operation is limited. A thorough assessment of status quo is needed for each fleet to identify potential to be exploited without major technological investment. Possible measures range from a revision of regulations for longitudinal train forces to radio-controlled double-traction. |
![]() |
References / Links: |
![]() |
Attachments: |
![]() |
Related projects: |
![]() |
Contact persons: |
![]() |
![]() |
© UIC - International Union of Railways 2003 |