Technologies        
  Hauptmenu
 
    Introduction
    Database
    -  Technologies
  -  Projects
    Calendar
    Discussions
    Contact & Links
    Imprint & Disclaimer
    Sitemap
 
 


     
 
Content
 
back to list go back to technology list      previous previous technology  next technology  next

   LCC-driven procurement  evaluated  
Life cycle costs are the most complete cost indicator and at the same time favour energy efficient technologies.
Technology field: Management and organisation
close main section General information
  close sub-section Description
   

Life cycle costing

Besides product quality, cost is obviously a major factor in procurement decisions. The approach of life-cycle costing (LCC) considers the expenses of the customer along the entire life-cycle of the product. This includes capital costs (depreciation interest) and operation costs (energy, maintenance etc.). There is no canonical and standardized LCC concept for rail vehicles. Some LCC calculations include costs for operation personnel, costs of downtimes, costs for disposal, others don't.

LCC of rail vehicles

The following table gives an idea of the relevance of energy costs in LCC (Costs for personnel are excluded, since some of the sources specified them while others didn't).

Table 1: LCC for rail vehicles

Locomotive for
   passenger service*  

Locomotive for
   freight service*  

   High-speed train  
(ICE 3)**

Investment

22,7 %

11,7 %

80,8 %

Energy

46,2 %

73,8 %

7,8 %

Maintenance   

31,0 %

14,4 %

11,4 %

Source: * Trümpi 1998 ** Ernst 2001

The figures presented in table 1 have to be treated with caution. They are taken from different sources and are therefore based on somewhat different assumptions (interest rates, energy costs etc.). Moreover, the great differences between locomotives and ICE stems firstly from the fact that LCC of ICE refer to an entire train, whereas LCC for the locomotive excludes coaches/freight wagons, and secondly, that it is assumed that locomotives have a useful life of 25 years compared to 15 years for ICE 3.

Relevance of LCC in purchasing

Most purchasing contracts between operators and manufacturers contain LCC guarantees and foresee penalty clauses for the case of non-compliance. Nevertheless, in many cases purchasing costs rather than LCC are decisive in procurement.

While being theoretically the most complete cost indicator, LCC is difficult to handle and cannot be given in a general and straightforward manner. The reason is its strong dependence on operational conditions, which vary between operators and may not be predictable for the future.

LCC and energy efficiency

Most innovative energy efficiency technologies will improve LCC while raising purchasing costs. More technically speaking, any technology with a payback time shorter than the life-cycle will reduce LCC.

Even though LCC are often squarely in favour of energy efficient rolling stock, procurement decisions often prefer less efficient products due to lower initial investment. LCC-oriented procurement is therefore key factors for saving energy in railways.

The following evaluation refers to barriers and success factors for a more LCC-driven procurement.

close main section General criteria
  open sub-section Status of development: in use
  Time horizon for broad application: 2 - 5 years
  Expected technological development: not applicable
  Benefits (other than environmental): big
  Barriers: high
  Applicability for railway segments: high
    Type of traction:  electric - DC, electric - AC, diesel
    Type of transportation:  passenger - main lines, passenger - high speed, passenger - regional lines, passenger - suburban lines, freight
    Grade of diffusion into railway markets:
  Diffusion into relevant segment of fleet: not applicable
  Share of newly purchased stock: not applicable
  Market potential (railways): not applicable
close main section Environmental criteria
  close sub-section Impacts on energy efficiency:
  Energy efficiency potential for single vehicle: not applicable
  Energy efficiency potential throughout fleet: not applicable
    A greater role of LCC in purchasing would have a positive effect on the average energy efficiency of new stock. These effects are undoubted but difficult to quantify in general terms.
  Other environmental impacts: neutral
    Especially if end-of-life aspects of rail vehicles are included in the LCC perspective, there could be positive environmental aspects in the field of recycling etc.
open main section Economic criteria
no data available Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)
close main section Overall rating
  close sub-section Overall potential: very promising
  Time horizon: mid-term
    An increased role of LCC in railway purchasing decisions is one of the key success factors for a rapid diffusion of innovative technologies for energy efficiency. At the same time, in a cost perspective focusing on the whole company rather than individual departments or sub-companies, a more LCC-driven procurement could make a valuable contribution to cost efficiency. Success factors are bonus rules in procurement contracts or better verification of LCC guarantees. Barriers are high and are mainly concerned with the high degree of cost segmentation within railways and the lack of corresponding financial interfaces between individual departments. In view of the clear win-win situation for the environmental and economic performance of both railways and industry, the issue should be given high priority.
References / Links:  Trümpi 1998;  Pittius 2000;  Ernst 2001
Attachments:
Related projects:  PROSPER (Procedures for Rolling Stock Procurement with Environmental Requirements)
Contact persons:
 date created: 2002-10-09
 
 
© UIC - International Union of Railways 2003
 
Aktionmenu
 
 Your contribution
   add technology
 Views of this page
   show overview
   show evaluation
   show details
 Print options
   print data sheet
   print screen
 Help
   Evaluation briefing
   Technology list
    French - German