|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
General criteria
|
|
|
Environmental criteria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impacts on energy efficiency:
|
|
|
|
|
Energy efficiency potential for single vehicle: < 2% |
|
|
|
|
Energy efficiency potential throughout fleet: < 1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other environmental impacts: neutral |
|
|
Economic criteria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle - fix costs: low |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vehicle - running costs: minor reduction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure - fix costs: none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure - running costs: unchanged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scale effects: none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortisation: < 1 year |
|
|
Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)
|
|
|
Overall rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall potential: interesting |
|
|
|
|
Time horizon: short-term |
|
|
|
|
|
A control mechanism for power intake has become a standard in new electric stock. The saving potential is moderate. Since a retrofit of old stock is not possible, the diffusion of the technology does not depend on any additional efforts on the part of railways. |