Technologies        
  Hauptmenu
 
    Introduction
    Database
    -  Technologies
  -  Projects
    Calendar
    Discussions
    Contact & Links
    Imprint & Disclaimer
    Sitemap
 
 


     
 
Content
 
back to list go back to technology list      previous previous technology  next technology  next

   Mechatronic innovations for future running gear  evaluated  
In recent years there have been growing efforts from mechatronics to study active suspension technologies for railways based on sensors, controllers and actuators. Mechatronics could revolutionize suspension technologies and considerably reduce train weight.
Technology field: Mass reduction
close main section General information
  open sub-section Description
close main section General criteria
  close sub-section Status of development: test series
    In the field of secondary suspensions, besides wide-spread use of tilting there have been numerous attempts and research efforts. ADtranz in Sweden has looked into "semi-active" electronically-controlled lateral dampers for the X2000 tilting train. Similar efforts have been done at ABB, Alstom and others. In Japan hydraulic and pneumatic actuators have been tested on the WIN350 train. Implementation of active primary suspensions is still further away. Some research has been conducted in the Netherlands for the Rotterdam tram as well as in Germany and Austria. The Copenhagen S-trains with (LINK!) KERFs do not use active suspensions in the strict sense used here, but represent an important development in this direction. An international research consortium "Mechatronic technologies for trains of the future" (funded by the European Commission) is currently studying the potential of these and other mechatronic developments for future train design.
  Time horizon for broad application: in > 10 years
   

In the field of secondary suspensions, besides wide-spread use of tilting there have been numerous attempts and research efforts. ADtranz in Sweden has looked into "semi-active" electronically-controlled lateral dampers for the X2000 tilting train. Similar efforts have been done at ABB, Alstom and others. In Japan hydraulic and pneumatic actuators have been tested on the WIN350 train.

Implementation of active primary suspensions is still further away. Some research has been conducted in the Netherlands for the Rotterdam tram as well as in Germany and Austria. The Copenhagen S-trains with (LINK!) KERFs do not use active suspensions in the strict sense used here, but represent an important development in this direction.

An international research consortium "Mechatronic technologies for trains of the future" (funded by the European Commission) is currently studying the potential of these and other mechatronic developments for future train design.

  Expected technological development: highly dynamic
    (no details available)
    Motivation:
   
  • Weight reduction
  • Reduced mechanical complexity
  Benefits (other than environmental): big
   

Reduction of wear and tear

Less wear on wheels and track through improved curving capability

Weight reduction

Active steering makes two-axle bogieless vehicles feasible, offering advantages such as

  • reduced mechanical complexity (which of course is paid for by a higher degree of electronic control complexity)
  • reduced vehicle weight
  • reduced traction/braking requirements
  • reduced energy consumption
  • reduced track damage

Extra functionalities

A mechatronic approach may bring added value of a different kind, e.g. the integration of the suspension, guidance, drive and braking sub-systems which today are designed and controlled separately. The use of differential torque control to achieve active steering or guidance is a step towards higher degrees of system integration. In addition, condition and fault diagnosis for maintenance purposes could be provided at low extra cost, making use of the sensors fitted for mechatronic control.

  Barriers: high
   

Technological inertia

Primary suspensions are an extremely fundamental and safety-critical sub-system of a railway vehicle. Therefore it will not be easy to replace the well-known and mature bogie technology by innovative technologies.

Safety and reliability

Primary suspensions are still confronted with a number of safety problems. More research is needed.

    Success factors:
   

Actively controlled running gear meets very high acceptance barriers due to doubts about safety and reliability. Success factors are:

Thorough risk assessment

Make a thorough risk assessment of the whole vehicle rather than running gear alone.

Communication strategy

In order to overcome scepticism, a convincing communication strategy is essential. The focus should be put on successful use of active controlled mechanical elements in other industries:

  • automotive: Anti-lock braking system (ABS), Active stability control (ASC)
  • aerospace: fly-by-wire etc.

But also in railways, tilting trains are an example of successful introduction of active control elements and are seen by experts as the "tip of an iceberg" (Goodall, Kortüm 2000) that could facilitate introduction of mechatronic solutions in other fields.

  Applicability for railway segments: high
    Type of traction:  electric - DC, electric - AC, diesel
    Type of transportation:  passenger - main lines, passenger - high speed, passenger - regional lines, passenger - suburban lines, freight
    (no details available)
    Grade of diffusion into railway markets:
  Diffusion into relevant segment of fleet: 0 %
  Share of newly purchased stock: 0 %
    Technology not marketable yet.
  Market potential (railways): highly uncertain
    Implementation potential of active primary suspensions is highly uncertain. therefore it is presently impossible to assess the market potential.
    Example:
   

 

close main section Environmental criteria
  open sub-section Impacts on energy efficiency:
  Energy efficiency potential for single vehicle: (no data)
  Energy efficiency potential throughout fleet: (no data)
  Other environmental impacts: positive
close main section Economic criteria
  open sub-section Vehicle - fix costs: medium
  Vehicle - running costs: significant reduction
  Infrastructure - fix costs: none
  Infrastructure - running costs: reduced
  Scale effects: high
  Amortisation: (no data)
no data available Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)
close main section Overall rating
  close sub-section Overall potential: very promising
  Time horizon: long-term
    Active running gear could in long-term perspective revolutionize the design and layout of rolling stock with beneficial consequences for train mass, energy efficiency, noise reduction etc. Although this lane of development is marked by many uncertainties, intensive R&D efforts seem justified.
References / Links:  Ellis et al. (no year)
Attachments:
Related projects:
Contact persons:
 date created: 2002-10-09
 
 
© UIC - International Union of Railways 2003
 
Aktionmenu
 
 Your contribution
   add technology
 Views of this page
   show overview
   show evaluation
   show details
 Print options
   print data sheet
   print screen
 Help
   Evaluation briefing
   Technology list
    French - German