Technologies        
  Hauptmenu
 
    Introduction
    Database
    -  Technologies
  -  Projects
    Calendar
    Discussions
    Contact & Links
    Imprint & Disclaimer
    Sitemap
 
 


     
 
Content
 
back to list go back to technology list      previous previous technology  next technology  next

   Moving block  evaluated  
Traditional signalling systems are based on fixed blocks. In a moving block system trains are continuously controlled and kept at braking distance from each other. This is realized by a Radio link to the control centre. Moving block systems increase line capacity and improve traffic fluidity and thus energy efficiency. Moving block is foreseen by ETCS level 3.
Technology field: Energy efficient driving
close main section General information
  close sub-section Description
   

Principle of moving block

Traditional signalling systems are based on so called fixed blocks: the railway is divided into

sections of track, which are separated by signals. A train is not allowed to enter a given track section (=block) before the preceding train has cleared it. This system has a number of disadvantages, one being its lack of flexibility: the block size is the same for all trains regardless of their speed and braking performance. Thus the big safety distances required by fast trains are imposed on slower trains as well. Obviously this reduces track capacity.

A moving block system (often called CBTC = Communications Based Train Control) does not require traditional fixed-block track circuits for determining train position. Instead, it relies on continuous two-way digital communication between each controlled train and a wayside control centre.

On a moving block equipped railway, the line is usually divided into areas or regions, each area under the control of a computer and each with its own radio transmission system. Each train transmits its identity, location, direction and speed to the area computer which makes the necessary calculations for safe train separation and transmits this to the following train. The radio link between each train and the area computer is continuous so the computer knows the location of all the trains in its area all the time. It transmits to each train the location of the train in front and gives it a braking curve to enable it to stop before it reaches that train. In effect, it is a dynamic distance-to-go system. As long as each train is travelling at the same speed as the one in front and they all have the same braking capabilities, they can, in theory, run as close together as a few metres (e.g. about 50 metres at 50 km/h). This, of course, would contradict the railways safety policies. Instead, one safety feature of fixed block signalling is usually retained - the requirement for a full speed braking distance between trains. This ensures that, if the radio link is lost, the latest data retained on board the following train will cause it to stop before it reaches the preceding train.

What distinguishes moving block from fixed block is that it makes the block locations and lengths consistent with train location and speed, i.e. making them movable rather than fixed.

Potential application contexts for moving block:

ETCS level 3:

The European Train Control System (ETCS) containing the interoperability specifications of future train operation in Europe will be introduced in three steps (ETCS Level 1 – 3). The introduction of moving block train control will not be possible before level 3 is reached. This level is characterised by the following features:

  • Bidirectional information transmission between train and the Radio Block Center (RBC) with the GSM-R standard.
  • Train positioning by EUROBALISES (beacons) installed every 1000 m between the rails. On the sections between two balises positioning is realised by radar and odometers allowing very high levels of accuracy.
  • Continuous and safe speed control
  • On-board train integrity check (presently done by track-side axle-counters)
  • virtual block control by the Radio Block Centers (=moving block)
  • Only trains equipped for level 3 are allowed on level 3 tracks.

Radio control for regional lines

The principles of ETCS and GSM-R developed for the European high speed, cross-border traffic may also be used in other contexts. The German DB AG currently tests the introduction of a radio control based on the ETCS elements EURORADIO (using GSM-R), EUROBALISE and EUROCAB on some of its regional lines (Funkfahrbetrieb (FFB)). The French Reseau Ferroviaire Francaise (RFF) will realise a similar pilot project. Radio control on regional lines does not necessarily imply moving block principles but allows them as a option.

Seltrac by Alcaltel

One Seltrac system marketed by Alcatel claims to be the first moving block system is that. It is used in Canada and on the Docklands Light Railway in London. Even though it has the key components of moving block systems, data transmission is not realised by a radio link but by track-mounted induction loops installed between the rails and crossing every 25 metres allowing trains to verify their position. Data is passed between the vehicle on-board computer (VOBC) and the vehicle control centre (VCC) through the loops. The VCC controls the speed of Train 2 by checking the position of Train 1 and calculating its safe braking curve. The Seltrac system requires no driver, as it is fully automatic. In case of a system failure axle counters allow for train positioning. The main drawback is the need for continuous cables to be installed within the tracks, which are expensive to install and vulnerable to damage during track maintenance.

Evaluation focus

Different realisations of the moving block concept are conceivable. The following evaluation concentrates on the versions envisioned by ETCS level 3 (including its limited introduction on regional lines).

The operational principle of moving block and the introduction of radio control are closely linked and therefore cannot be evaluated separately. However one must keep in mind that radio control is at the basis of moving block but does not necessarily imply it.

close main section General criteria
  close sub-section Status of development: test series
   

Whereas radio controlled train operation has reached the stage of pilot projects, so far no realisation of moving block based on radio transmission is known.

  • Seltrac by Alcatel, an early and reduced version of moving block, has reached the application stage.
  • The ETCS level 3 is confronted with some problems of technological and operational nature still to be resolved. After Railtrack retreated from equipping its West Coast Main Line with ETCS Level 3, there are presently no plans for introducing this level on any line in short term perspective. The new German high speed line Cologne – Frankfurt, opened in late 2002 for 300 km/h, could be appropriate to test ETCS service, since it will be limited to modern high speed trains. There is a number of European lines where all ETCS levels will be tested in the next years (on of them being the DB line Ludwigsfelde - Jüterbog).
  • Pilot projects for an ETCS-analogue radio control on regional lines are under way in Germany and France. While theoretically allowing moving block as an option, these lines will be operated in the near future by a radio controlled fixed-block.
  Time horizon for broad application: in > 10 years
    A broad application of moving block on European main lines is coupled to ETCS level 3. This level will probably not be introduced on a large scale before some time between 2010 and 2020. Experts believe that by the year 2010 less than 10.000 km of railways will be equipped with ETCS Level 1 or 2. Because of the delays in the diffusion of ETCS, DB AG thinks about equipping more lines with LZB-CIR-ELKE (a kind of flexibilised fixed-block train control). Feasibility and time horizon of a system-wide roll-out of radio control on regional lines at German DB will be determined by the company’s long-term train control strategy.
  Expected technological development: dynamic
    (no details available)
    Motivation:
   
  • Improvements in operations and in operating capacity (motivation for moving block)
  • Reduction of fixed infrastructure costs, since expensive wayside equipment is replaced by on-board devices (motivation for communication based train control not necessarily implies moving block)
  Benefits (other than environmental): big
   

Increased capacity

  • The development should lead to more regular traffic flows with fewer delays. Exploitation of Moving Block capabilities will permit railway administrations and operators to increase line capacity, utilise the network infrastructure more efficiently, and improve service.
  • The improvement in capacity will provide opportunities for independent operators to use the common infrastructures.
  Barriers: high
   

Transition costs

The transition from track-side signalling to GSM-R based “virtual” signalling is confronted by a number of specific problems of economic and organisational nature:

  • Longevity of systems: Typical depreciation periods of train control systems are about 20 years. It is therefore not economical to abandon the system earlier. This issue is particularly relevant if national authorities are involved in financing infrastructure measures (as is the case in Germany).
  • Cost distribution: Even though the technical transition from track-side signalling to GSM-R based “virtual” signalling is expected to prove economical from an overall perspective, the track-side savings have to be paid by additional investments for vehicle equipment. Consequently acceptance problems arise if infrastructure and vehicles are managed by different companies. This issue is virulent even within the DB AG, where the infrastructure operator DB Netz profits from the transition whereas DB Cargo and DB Reise are confronted with additional costs.
  • Apart from these intrinsic problems of the technological transition, the international character of the ETCS process brings about lengthy decision making and standardisation processes.

Technological shortcomings

ETCS level 3 poses a number of technical challenges to be resolved:

  • To the present day there exists no satisfying solution for the on-board train integrity check of freight trains. The US principle of „end of train telemetry“ with a radio device on the last coach is rejected by European operators due to difficult logistics.
  • There remain uncertainties concerning the ways for securing switch sections. In a fixed block system this is done by the signalling stations, in a ETCS 3 system the train distance is to be controlled by the Radio block centres. Their operating logics is to be clarified as far as switch areas are concerned.
  • Security standards pose very high requirements on the preciseness and infallibility of train positioning. Although this challenge seems to be resolved in a satisfying manner by a combination of EUROBALISES, radar and odometers, the system still awaits the official operating permission by the railway institutions (respective tests for operation permits by the German EBA (Eisenbahnbundesamt) will be finished by 2003).

Uncertainties about effect on traffic fluidity

The performance benefits of moving block as compared to fixed block operation is questioned by some authors. They hold that contrary to what is generally believed the difference in track performance of fixed block with shortened block lengths as compared to moving block operation is negligible because the performance of a given track today is much more influenced by timetable structure than by distance control.

    Success factors:
   
  • As far as capacity and smooth traffic flow are concerned, moving block is most effective if the train speeds on a given track are homogeneous. A principal success factor for moving block is therefore the strategy of network separation.
  • Energy efficiency is not a key driver for the introduction of moving block. Nevertheless, more reliable information on the efficiency potential of moving vs. fixed block train control is needed and could supply additional arguments for radio-controlled train operation.
  Applicability for railway segments: high
    Type of traction:  electric - DC, electric - AC, diesel
    Type of transportation:  passenger - main lines, passenger - high speed, passenger - regional lines, passenger - suburban lines, freight
    Moving block systems can be implemented in principle on virtually all lines and services. Concrete plans exist for European main lines in the ETCS context and for German regional lines in the FFB context.
    Grade of diffusion into railway markets:
  Diffusion into relevant segment of fleet: 0 %
  Share of newly purchased stock: 0 %
    There are no main-line railway applications of true moving block systems in existence at present.
  Market potential (railways): highly uncertain
    (no details available)
    Example:
    There are no main-line railway applications of true moving block systems in existence at present.
close main section Environmental criteria
  close sub-section Impacts on energy efficiency:
  Energy efficiency potential for single vehicle: (no data)
  Energy efficiency potential throughout fleet: (no data)
   

Moving block systems are expected to lead to a smoother traffic flow and to a considerable reduction of train stops (or decelerations) along the track. The reason is very simple. In a fixed block system trains often have to stop because the track section ahead is not cleared yet, although the braking distance from the preceding train would allow to continue.

This effect is widely accepted. It is however very difficult to quantify. Quantification would require knowledge of

  • the average number of stops along the track imposed by fixed block signalling
  • the share of those stops being eliminated by moving block
  • the average energy consumed per stop

Some experts warn, not to overestimate the effect of moving block on traffic fluidity and suggest to consider other measures as well, e.g. Optimisation of train operation by control center and demixing.

  Other environmental impacts: positive
    To a certain degree increased capacity can reduce the need to build new tracks and thus reduce area consumption of railways.
close main section Economic criteria
  close sub-section Vehicle - fix costs: low
    (no details available)
  Vehicle - running costs: (no data)
    (no details available)
  Infrastructure - fix costs: high
    (no details available)
  Infrastructure - running costs: reduced
    Railway signalling has traditionally required a large amount of expensive hardware to be distributed all along a route which is exposed to variable climatic conditions, wear, vandalism, theft and heavy usage. Because of the widely spaced distribution, maintenance is expensive and often restricted to times when trains are not running. Failures in wayside equipment are difficult to locate and difficult to reach. On metros, access is further restricted within tunnels and elevated sections. Moving block requires less wayside equipment than fixed block systems. Estimations made in the context of radio controlled regional lines indicate considerable cost reductions for personnel and maintenance due to a strong reduction in way-side equipment.
  Scale effects: medium
    (no details available)
  Amortisation: (no data)
    (no details available)
no data available Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)
close main section Overall rating
  close sub-section Overall potential: promising
  Time horizon: long-term
    Train control systems based on moving block show a better traffic fluidity than today's fixed block systems do. This will increase line capacity and have a positive impact on energy efficiency of train operation. The most realistic lane towards moving block in European railways is presented by level 3 of ETCS. However, co-ordination efforts, interoperability issues and high investment costs of the required system transition are expected to delay introduction of the higher levels of ETCS. More reliable information of the energy saving potential of moving vs. fixed block train control is needed.
References / Links:  Bombardier 2001;  Dachwald et al. 2001;  Oser et al. 1997;  Pachl 2000;  Hoglate, Lawrence 1997
Attachments:
Related projects:
Contact persons:
 date created: 2002-10-09
 
 
© UIC - International Union of Railways 2003
 
Aktionmenu
 
 Your contribution
   add technology
 Views of this page
   show overview
   show evaluation
   show details
 Print options
   print data sheet
   print screen
 Help
   Evaluation briefing
   Technology list
    French - German