Technologies        
  Hauptmenu
 
    Introduction
    Database
    -  Technologies
  -  Projects
    Calendar
    Discussions
    Contact & Links
    Imprint & Disclaimer
    Sitemap
 
 


     
 
Content
 
back to list go back to technology list      previous previous technology  next technology  next

   Control of comfort functions in parked trains  evaluated  
Parked passenger trains are often heated all night. This consumes substantial amounts of energy. A possible solution is the development and implementation of an intelligent control tool for parked trains.
Technology field: Optimisation of comfort functions
close main section General information
  close sub-section Description
   

Under cold outside conditions, parked trains are heated and lighted partly or completely overnight for several reasons:

  • in order to guarantee optimum comfort when service starts next morning.
  • in order to ensure a comfortable working environment for cleaning personnel during the night
  • in order to avoid damage to equipment due to freezing

In countries of Central and Northern Europe, overnight standstill consumes considerable amounts of energy.

Existing solutions to reduce this energy consumption include:

  • Manual control: Comfort functions are manually switched off after service and back on to “preheat” the coaches 1 or 2 hours before service starts. This is however expensive and difficult to organise.
  • Automatic control: Comfort functions during standstill are controlled automatically by an on-board timer or (in a more advanced version) by telematics (remote control).
  • Reduction of conversion losses: A special solution to this problem has been developed at DSB: A software tool allowing for the common energy supply of two trains via one pantograph. For details, see Coupling of parked trains for common energy supply
  • Gradual heating during service: Some experts propose unconventional measures to save overnight heating. On those lines not requiring the full train capacity on the first track section (i.e. between the first two or three stations), it could be sufficient to heat only one coach overnight, and heat the other ones by recovered braking energy on the first track sections. This would however require not opening some coaches to passengers before the second or third station. Such an approach is expected to find no acceptance in railways and is therefore not promising.

This evaluation focuses on automatic control systems.

Technical details

No general system specifications for an automatic control of overnight operation of comfort functions in trains can be given since on-board control of comfort functions is highly heterogeneous. Existing solutions mainly differ with respect to the following features:

  • Centralised control device for the entire train
  • Possibility to operate lighting and heating at one third or half intensity
  • Special programmes for anti-freezing or preheating operation

This heterogeneity of operation concepts makes any standard solution difficult.

close main section General criteria
  close sub-section Status of development: in use
    Many railway companies apply control devices to reduce the energy demand during overnight standstill to a certain degree. This includes the use of simple timers etc.
  Time horizon for broad application: 2 - 5 years
    (no details available)
  Expected technological development: dynamic
    Especially in the field of telematic control solutions, the technological development potential is still high.
    Motivation:
    Energy saving
  Benefits (other than environmental): none
    (no details available)
  Barriers: medium
   

Organisation

The coaches have to be warm when the trains are cleaned. However the time the cleaning personnel arrives varies too much to program the timer in a way to take this into consideration. Due to low salaries, the motivation of cleaning personnel to collaborate in such measures is generally low.

Heterogeneity of stock and stand-still facilities

The on-board equipment for controlling comfort functions are highly variable between vehicles. This impedes the development of a generalized automatic control with big scale effects.

Acceptance by management

As long as no metering equipment is in place to measure energy consumption during standstill, it is difficult to make a cost-benefit analysis and to convince management.

Danger of freezing

Some operators are reluctant to switch off heating in the night due to the danger of freezing and damage to equipment. DSB has discussed installing a timer to reduce the coach temperature to 5°C during the night and then automatically raise it to 22°C before service. However, it could not be ruled out that in exceptionally cold periods the inside temperature would fall below 5°C with consequences such as water freezing in the toilets etc. Therefore the measure was not implemented in the end.

    Success factors:
   
  • Assessment of current operation practice for standstill in order to identify possible measures and required functionalities of an automatic control tool.
  • Motivation and incentives of cleaning personnel to collaborate in saving measures
  • Advanced control systems to avoid danger of freezing etc.
  Applicability for railway segments: high
    Type of traction:  electric - DC, electric - AC, diesel
    Type of transportation:  passenger - main lines, passenger - high speed, passenger - regional lines, passenger - suburban lines
    (no details available)
    Grade of diffusion into railway markets:
  Diffusion into relevant segment of fleet: 5 - 20%
  Share of newly purchased stock: not applicable
    (no details available)
  Market potential (railways): high
    (no details available)
    Example:
   

PLC system at SJ

An automatic control for overnight standstill is currently studied in Sweden. The so called PLC system (Programmable Logistic Control) will optimise the use of electricity so that heat and light is minimised during parking hours, but automatically switched back on well before service starts again. During service the temperature lies between 18 and 20° C. When service ends, coach temperature is lowered to 12° C, and raised again to service temperature one hour before service start. This is done fully automatically. In order to avoid failures everything is built in twice.

close main section Environmental criteria
  close sub-section Impacts on energy efficiency:
  Energy efficiency potential for single vehicle: 2 - 5%
  Energy efficiency potential throughout fleet: 2 - 5%
    According to different sources, in countries of Central and Northern Europe energy consumption during standstill is up to 10% of the total energy demand for train operation. In Mediterranean countries, the share will be lower. It is a reasonable estimate to assume that this energy can be reduced by ~ 50% by an intelligent control system. So the saving potential is about 2 - 5 % per vehicle. This estimate may be even rather conservative compared to calculations made by SJ in the context of their introduction of the PLC system. The operator estimated a saving potential of 15.000 kWh per year and coach. Given the total consumption for coach heating of about 55.000 kWh per year and coach, the measure is expected to save between 20 and 30% of the energy consumed for heating. Since heating energy (including both during standstill and operation) makes up about 20-30% of the total energy consumption of a train, the saving potential of the measure (with respect to the vehicle’s total energy consumption) is therefore between 4 and 9 % per vehicle. This is realistic in Scandinavian countries but would be too optimistic for countries like France or Italy.
  Other environmental impacts: neutral
    (no details available)
close main section Economic criteria
  close sub-section Vehicle - fix costs: low
    The installation of an automatic control tool is rather cheap as long as rolling stock offers a convenient interface for such a system, e.g. a central control for the comfort functions.
  Vehicle - running costs: significant reduction
    (no details available)
  Infrastructure - fix costs: low
    (no details available)
  Infrastructure - running costs: unchanged
    (no details available)
  Scale effects: low
    Scale effects will be low due to heterogeneity of stock.
  Amortisation: < 1 year
    Very short amortisation periods.
no data available Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)
close main section Overall rating
  close sub-section Overall potential: very promising
  Time horizon: mid-term
    An automated control of comfort functions in parked trains is seen as a very effective mid-term means to save energy in passenger operation. The saving potential is very high in Central and Northern European countries and medium in Southern Europe. The two main barriers lie in the heterogeneity of rolling stock and organisational hurdles such as variable hours of cleaning personnel. Therefore a successful development and implementation of such a system has to be preceded by a thorough assessment of types of passenger coaches and operational practice in the treatment of parked trains.
References / Links:
Attachments:
Related projects:  PLC system on parked trains
Contact persons:
 date created: 2002-10-09
 
 
© UIC - International Union of Railways 2003
 
Aktionmenu
 
 Your contribution
   add technology
 Views of this page
   show overview
   show evaluation
   show details
 Print options
   print data sheet
   print screen
 Help
   Evaluation briefing
   Technology list
    French - German