Technologies        
  Hauptmenu
 
    Introduction
    Database
    -  Technologies
  -  Projects
    Calendar
    Discussions
    Contact & Links
    Imprint & Disclaimer
    Sitemap
 
 


     
 
Content
 
back to list go back to technology list      previous previous technology  next technology  next

   Single-axle bogies  evaluated  
Due to the significant share of bogies in overall train mass, single-axle running gear can make an appreciable contribution to mass reduction. Curve-steered bogies with self-steering wheelsets (KERFs) are a mature single-axle solution for local and regional trains.
Technology field: Mass reduction
close main section General information
  close sub-section Description
   

The concept of single-axle bogies is old and has been realised in several trains including the Spanish Talgo. Since bogies take a substantial share of overall train mass, single-axle bogies make an appreciable contribution to mass reduction.

Single-axle bogies have potential in both passenger and freight service. In freight operation, the challenges arising are however very different from those in passenger operation. This evaluation is focussed on single-axle concepts for passenger operation.

KERFs

One of the challenges of single-axle bogies has always been the optimisation of wheelset orientation in order ot reduce wear and noise. In the 1990s this problem was solved in a satisfactory manner by the Alstom development of KERFs ("Kurvengesteuerte Einzelradsatz-Fahrwerke"), curve-steered bogies with self-steering wheelset. KERFs were realised in the Copenhagen suburban trains and in the Alstom LIREX experimental train.

Although there is a variety of concepts for single-axle bogies, the following focusses on KERFs, presently being one of the most promising realisations of single-axle running gear.

Train concept

KERFs can only be realised in articulated trains. In the case of the Copenhagne suburban trains, the full train rests on 10 KERF wheelsets, compared to 16 for the previous generation of urban trains.

Figure 1: Composition of Copenhagen suburban train with KERFs

copenhagen_s-tog.gif

Source: IZT

Steering concept of KERF

The main innovation of the KERF concept lies in the steering control. Passive hydraulic steering devices orient the wheelsets according to the angle between two coaches. The flexibility of the wheelsets however allows for an improvement of the steering input by self-steering.

close main section General criteria
  close sub-section Status of development: (no data)
    (no details available)
  Time horizon for broad application: 5 - 10 years
    (no details available)
  Expected technological development: highly dynamic
   

The new Copenhagen S-trains show that single-axle running gear of the KERF type are a mature technology. There is however still considerable potential for further technological development, especially as far as the self-steering concept is concerned. There are many possible lanes of future development going far beyond the KERF concept, especially in the field of mechatronically controlled running gear.

    Motivation:
    Mass reduction
  Benefits (other than environmental): medium
   

Mass reduction

Besides reduced energy consumption, weight reduction leads to higher acceleration rates for given traction power (or less traction power to be installed for a given acceleration rate).

  Barriers: medium
   

Technological maturity

KERFs being a relatively new technology with only one train type running in regular service (Copenhagen S-train), there is still some scepticism about the reliability of the concept.

    Success factors:
    (no details available)
  Applicability for railway segments: (no data)
    Type of traction:  electric - DC, electric - AC, diesel
    Type of transportation:  passenger - main lines, passenger - high speed, passenger - regional lines, passenger - suburban lines, freight
    Single-axle concepts have potential in many types of trains. It is however obvious that due to lower train weight the short-term potential is especially high in local and regional operation. This is also the area with highest energy efficiency effects (cf. Environmental criteria - Energy efficiency potential).
    Grade of diffusion into railway markets:
  Diffusion into relevant segment of fleet: < 5%
  Share of newly purchased stock: < 20%
    (no details available)
  Market potential (railways): medium
    (no details available)
    Example:
    Copenhagen S-trains
close main section Environmental criteria
  close sub-section Impacts on energy efficiency:
  Energy efficiency potential for single vehicle: 5 - 10%
  Energy efficiency potential throughout fleet: 2 - 5%
   

Single-axle bogies improve energy efficiency due to mass reduction. In order to estimate the mass reduction potential through KERFs, the new Copenhagen S-trains (cf. Description) may be taken as an example. They consist of 8 cars resting on 10 KERFs and have the same length as the old train sets composed of 4 cars resting on 8 conventional bogies. One KERF weighs about 50-60% of the mass of a conventional bogie (cf. Lenhard 2000). So the total mass of the KERFs along the train is about 62,5% - 75% of the bogie mass in the old trains.

Taking into account that in conventional EMUs, bogies (motor and trailer bogies) account for 30-40% of the total train weight, the weight reduction to be achieved with single-axle running gear is in the order of 7 - 14%.

The following elasticity table shows that the effect on overall energy effciency is 1-3 % in main line and high-speed transport and up to 9 % in local and regional transport.

 

Traction

Brake energy recovery

Effect on train mass

Elasticity with regard to train mass

Effect on
total energy consumption for traction

High speed train

electric

no

7 - 14 %

0,17

1 – 2 %

 

 

yes

0,12

1 – 2 %

Intercity train

electric

no

0,19

1 – 3 %

 

 

yes

0,14

1 – 2 %

 

diesel

-

0,19

1 – 3 %

Regional train

electric

no

0,52

4 – 7 %

 

 

yes

0,44

3 – 6 %

 

diesel

-

0,52

4 – 7 %

Suburban train

electric

no

0,64

4 – 9 %

 

 

yes

0,57

4 – 8 %

 

diesel

-

0,64

4 – 9 %

Range:

1 - 9 %

 

  Other environmental impacts: neutral
    (no details available)
close main section Economic criteria
  close sub-section Vehicle - fix costs: medium
    Being a new bogie concept produced in small numbers and taylored to specific vehicles, costs are still relatively high but are expected to drop as soon as bigger production number are achieved.
  Vehicle - running costs: significant reduction
    (no details available)
  Infrastructure - fix costs: none
    (no details available)
  Infrastructure - running costs: unchanged
    (no details available)
  Scale effects: medium
    There will be some scale effects if KERF or other concepts become a wide-spread solution in railways.
  Amortisation: (no data)
    (no details available)
no data available Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)
close main section Overall rating
  close sub-section Overall potential: very promising
  Time horizon: mid-term
    Single-axle running gear are a very promising concept for replacing heavy 2-axle bogies in mid-term perspective. Energy efficiency effects are especially high in local and regional transport. In this railway segment, the Alstom KERFs represent a mature technology with first experience from regular service. Future developments and refinements point in the direction of mechatronic control. In long term perspective, a complete technological migration from conventional running gear to single-axle concepts in local and regional passenger transport should be aimed at.
References / Links:  Lenhard 2000
Attachments:
Related projects:  The purchase of the new Copenhagen S-trains
Contact persons:
 date created: 2002-10-09
 
 
© UIC - International Union of Railways 2003
 
Aktionmenu
 
 Your contribution
   add technology
 Views of this page
   show overview
   show evaluation
   show details
 Print options
   print data sheet
   print screen
 Help
   Evaluation briefing
   Technology list
    French - German