Technologies        
  Hauptmenu
 
    Introduction
    Database
    -  Technologies
  -  Projects
    Calendar
    Discussions
    Contact & Links
    Imprint & Disclaimer
    Sitemap
 
 


     
 
Content
 
back to list go back to technology list      previous previous technology  next technology  next

   Light coach interior equipment  evaluated  
Interior components such as seats, wall panelling and windows offer considerable potential for weight reduction. Possible measures include both the procurement of new stock and the refurbishment of old cars.
Technology field: Mass reduction
close main section General information
  close sub-section Description
   

The interior equipment of passenger coaches typically accounts for 10 to 20% of total coach weight.

Due to the fact that interior parts (seats, interior panels etc.) are usually non-structural components, there is big lightweight potential.

Interior fittings

In a modern saloon-type coach (German "Großraumwagen") of 25 m length, interior fittings (sides without windows and roof) have a surface of roughly 150 m2. Typical conventional components have a surface weight of 6,5 kg/m2, yielding a total weight of roughly 1 ton per coach.

New construction variants may substantially reduce this figure. Especially the sandwich option using prepregs with a foam or honeycomb core may reduce the mass of interior fittigs by some 35%.

Seats

Lighter seats are another effective means of weight reduction in coach interior equipment. The use lighter passenger seats formed part of the refit programme realized on several coaches at SBB.

close main section General criteria
  close sub-section Status of development: in use
    (no details available)
  Time horizon for broad application: now
    (no details available)
  Expected technological development: dynamic
    New developments will come mainly from new materials, especially fibre-reinforced polymers and sandwich structures.
    Motivation:
   
  • Weight reduction for reasons of vehicle dynamics
  • Energy saving
  Benefits (other than environmental): medium
   
  • Improvement of vehicle dynamics
  • Lowering of center of gravity
  • Reduced axle load
  Barriers: low
    If lightweight interior equipment combines mass reduction with high aesthetical value and passenger comfort, barriers are low.
    Success factors:
    (no details available)
  Applicability for railway segments: high
    Type of traction:  electric - DC, electric - AC, diesel
    Type of transportation:  passenger - main lines, passenger - high speed, passenger - regional lines, passenger - suburban lines
    Weight reductions in interior equipment are not only an option for new stock but may be part of retrofit measures on existing stock.
    Grade of diffusion into railway markets:
  Diffusion into relevant segment of fleet: not applicable
  Share of newly purchased stock: not applicable
    Weight reduction of interoreqiopment is a continuous process. Therefore a general grade of diffusion cannot be given.
  Market potential (railways): high
    (no details available)
    Example:
   

Copenhagen S-trains

The joint development project of DSB and the Siemens/LHB consortium included a thorough assessment of the optimum solution for interior equipment combining lightweight with LCA targets.

Refurbishment of coaches at SBB

In a coach retrofit project at SBB, the total weight was reduced by 2,0 tons from 44,0 to 42,0 tons (~ 5%). This was achieved by lighter setas and by elimination of one toilet.

close main section Environmental criteria
  close sub-section Impacts on energy efficiency:
  Energy efficiency potential for single vehicle: 2 - 5%
  Energy efficiency potential throughout fleet: 1 - 2%
   

In the coach retrofit project at SBB, the total weight was reduced by 2,0 tons from 44,0 to 42,0 tons (~ 5%). This was achieved by lighter setas and by elimination of one toilet. Although for new coaches there will be less reduction potential, an average reduction potential between 2 and 5% seems realistic. The estimated effect on overall energy efficiency is given by the following elasticity table:

 

Traction

Brake energy recovery

Effect on train mass

Elasticity with regard to train mass

Effect on
total energy consumption for traction

High speed train

electric

no

2-5%

0,17

0-1%

yes

2-5%

0,12

0-1%

Intercity train

electric

no

2-5%

0,19

0-1%

yes

2-5%

0,14

0-1%

diesel

-

2-5%

0,19

0-1%

Regional train

electric

no

2-5%

0,52

1-3%

yes

2-5%

0,44

1-2%

diesel

-

2-5%

0,52

1-3%

Suburban train

electric

no

2-5%

0,64

1-3%

yes

2-5%

0,57

1-3%

diesel

-

2-5%

0,64

1-3%

Range:

0-3%

  Other environmental impacts: neutral
   

 

close main section Economic criteria
  close sub-section Vehicle - fix costs: low
    Whereas high performance composite materials such as sandwich constructions used to be the exclusive domain of subsidized aerospace manufacturers, nowadays new materials and manufacturing processes (e.g. crushed-core construction for prepreg sandwiches) make them available at competitive prices for railway applications.
  Vehicle - running costs: significant reduction
    (no details available)
  Infrastructure - fix costs: none
    (no details available)
  Infrastructure - running costs: unchanged
    (no details available)
  Scale effects: (no data)
    (no details available)
  Amortisation: strongly dependent on specific application
    Depends on measure, generally rather low.
no data available Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)
close main section Overall rating
  close sub-section Overall potential: promising
  Time horizon: short-term
    Lightweight efforts for interior equipment of railway cars are a promising measure to be realized in short or mid term. Their effect on energy efficiency is medium. Barriers are low especially if lightweight equipment is part of the design of new stock. Corresponding refurbishment projects are most successful if the replacement of interior equipment is part of a bundle of energy efficiency measures ensuring good cost-benefit ratio.
References / Links:  Schlosser et al. 1996;  Schuon 1998;  Euro Transport Consult 1997;  Brunner et al. 2000
Attachments:
Related projects:  The purchase of the new Copenhagen S-trains;  Savings on Coaches, Type Bpm
Contact persons:
 date created: 2002-10-09
 
 
© UIC - International Union of Railways 2003
 
Aktionmenu
 
 Your contribution
   add technology
 Views of this page
   show overview
   show evaluation
   show details
 Print options
   print data sheet
   print screen
 Help
   Evaluation briefing
   Technology list
    French - German