click icon to print  

   Articulated trains (Jakob-type bogies)  evaluated  
Whereas conventional stock consists of individual carriages resting on two bogies each, articulated trains consist of a fixed composition of coaches with consecutive cars resting on shared bogies. This considerably reduces train weight per length.
Technology field: Mass reduction
close main section General information
  close sub-section Description
    Whereas conventional stock consists of individual carriages resting on two bogies each, in articulated trains consecutive cars rest on one shared bogie connecting the two cars (LIREX and Copenhagen S-trains being an exception). In articulated trains, cars are usually about 25% shorter.

Different realisations of articulated trains exist:

  • Jakob-type bogies: Consecutive cars rest on a shared two-axle bogie.
  • Single-axle bogies of the KERF type
  • Talgo trains: consecutive cars rest on a single axle running gear located between the two cars.

Figure 1 gives an overview.

The following evaluation refers to Jakob-type bogies being the most common running gear for articulated trains. However, many statements are true for articulated trains in general.

Figure 1: Different realisations of articulated trains

Articulated-trains.gif

Source: IZT

close main section General criteria
  close sub-section Status of development: in use
    Jakob-type bogies are successfully used in many railways. Examples are TGV, IC3, Talent and Desiro.
  Time horizon for broad application: now
    (no details available)
  Expected technological development: basically exploited
    (no details available)
    Motivation:
    Weight reduction
  Benefits (other than environmental): big
   

Train design and passenger comfort

Due to less train length car-bodies of articulated trains can be 10-20 cm wider than those of conventional trains for the same track and tunnel profiles. This improves seating comfort in 2 2 second class seating and allows to extend 2 2 seating (rather than 2  1 seating) to first class sections. Since car ends rest on joint bogies they do not sway out in curves. Due to this fact, interior car transitions can be designed to be wider than in conventional stock.

Weight reduction

Besides reduced energy consumption, weight reduction leads to higher acceleration rates for given traction power which is especially relevant in high-speed service.

  Barriers: high
   

Infrastructure

Since articulated trains form fixed car sets and cannot be easily decoupled into single cars, they put special requirements on the operator especially when it comes to maintenance and repairs. For most articulated trains very long maintenance workshops are needed (typically 150 m). This is one of the main reasons, why countries like Germany and Switzerland are reluctant to introduce main-line trains with Jakob-type bogies. However, depending on the existing infrastructure of the operator and the actual length of the train sets, the introduction does not always have to create major transition costs for the operator (cf. General criteria - Example).

Flexibility of train composition

In addition, the fixed train composition leads to less flexibility in train length. However, conventional MUs have the same restriction since traction components are distributed along the train-set and therefore the train cannot be decoupled into autonomous units. In both cases, the solution is to achieve flexibility by having short train sets that may be combined to form trains of variable length.

Axle load

Since the total weight is shared by less axles, articulated trains require additional lightweight efforts in order to keep axle-load below 16 tons.

    Success factors:
    (no details available)
  Applicability for railway segments: high
    Type of traction:  electric - DC, electric - AC, diesel
    Type of transportation:  passenger - main lines, passenger - high speed, passenger - regional lines, passenger - suburban lines
    (no details available)
    Grade of diffusion into railway markets:
  Diffusion into relevant segment of fleet: 5 - 20%
  Share of newly purchased stock: (no data)
    (no details available)
  Market potential (railways): medium
    In general, articulated trains offer a number of advantages, especially low weight. However, many operators fear high transition costs, at least in main-line fleet. Nevertheless, there is a considerable market for stock with Jakob-type bogies.
    Example:
   

IC3 at DSB

On a great part of their main line passenger service, DSB relies on the IC3, a diesel-mechanic train with Jakob-bogies. Before introducing the articulated train, it was checked if the workshops were prepared, especially as far as lifting of the whole train-set is concerned. Due to relatively short train-sets (59 meters), the transition efforts were limited.

close main section Environmental criteria
  close sub-section Impacts on energy efficiency:
  Energy efficiency potential for single vehicle: 2 - 5%
  Energy efficiency potential throughout fleet: 1 - 2%
   

The main energy efficiency effect comes from reduced weight. General figures on the weight reduction effect through Jakob-type bogies are not available, but the following estimate illustrates the potential:

  • In a conventional EMU, the mass of the bogies accounts for about one third of the total train weight.
  • The introduction of Jakob-type bogies reduces the ratio of bogies to cars by 30-50% (depending on train length).
  • On the other hand, the car length is reduced by about 25 %.
  • Therefore the number of bogies per train length is reduced by roughly 10-30%.
  • Assuming that Jakob-type bogies have roughly the same weight as conventional bogies, this means that the weight of bogies per train length is reduced by 10 - 30%.
  • This means a mass reduction potential of about 3 - 10 %, given that bogies account for about one third of the total train weight.

The following elasticity table gives the effect on overall energy demand for different types of operation:

Traction

Brake energy recovery

Effect on train mass

Elasticity with regard to train mass

Effect on
total energy consumption for traction

High speed train

electric

no

3 - 10 %

0,17

1 - 2 %

yes

0,12

 0 - 1 %

Intercity train

electric

no

0,19

 1 - 2 %

yes

0,14

 0 - 1 %

diesel

-

0,19

 1 - 2 %

Regional train

electric

no

0,52

 2 - 5 %

yes

0,44

 1 - 4 %

diesel

-

0,52

 2 - 5 %

Suburban train

electric

no

0,64

 2 - 6 %

yes

0,57

 2 - 6 %

diesel

-

0,64

 2 - 6 %

Range:

0 - 6 %

Source: IZT

  Other environmental impacts: neutral
   

 

close main section Economic criteria
  close sub-section Vehicle - fix costs: low
    (no details available)
  Vehicle - running costs: significant reduction
    (no details available)
  Infrastructure - fix costs: not applicable
   

Maintenance facilities

Depending on the length of the fixed train-sets, maintenance facilities have to be extended. In high-speed transport articulated trains are typically 150 meters long and require corresponding workshops for maintenance and repairs.

The transition costs are lower for the shorter train-sets used in local and regional transport. The Danish IC3 train-sets with a length of 59 m show that even in main-line transport short units can be used (of course in this particular case this possibility is owed to the special IC3 design allowing to fold away the driver cabins in order to create regular car transitions for passengers).

  Infrastructure - running costs: increased
    If longer maintenance halls have to be built, the costs for running these facilities are slightly increased as well.
  Scale effects: none
    (no details available)
  Amortisation: not applicable
    This strongly depends on the additional workshop infrastructure needed. If virtually no additional infrastructure is needed, there are no major additional costs to be paid back.
no data available Application outside railway sector (this technology is railway specific)
close main section Overall rating
  close sub-section Overall potential: promising
  Time horizon: mid-term
    Articulated trains are considerably lighter than their conventional counterparts. They have been used successfully for decades in all classes of passenger service. Short units of articulated trains used in local and regional service usually meet no major barriers. Longer units needed in main line and high-speed service often require additional buildings for maintenance and repairs. The corresponding transition costs represent the main barrier for articulated trains. Those operators not prepared for fixed train-sets should first exploit the potential for shorter articulated trains in local and regional transport and reconsider vehicle strategy in long-term.
References / Links:
Attachments:
Related projects:
Contact persons:
 date created: 2002-10-09
 
© UIC - International Union of Railways 2003